| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When building with -Wsometimes-uninitialized, Clang warns:
drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c:126:13: error: variable 'timebase' is used
uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false
[-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
The final else if functions as an else; make that explicit so that Clang
understands that timebase cannot be used uninitialized.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/400
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch fixes deadlock warning if removing PWM device
when CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is enabled.
This issue can be reproceduced by the following steps on
the R-Car H3 Salvator-X board if the backlight is disabled:
# cd /sys/class/pwm/pwmchip0
# echo 0 > export
# ls
device export npwm power pwm0 subsystem uevent unexport
# cd device/driver
# ls
bind e6e31000.pwm uevent unbind
# echo e6e31000.pwm > unbind
[ 87.659974] ======================================================
[ 87.666149] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 87.672327] 5.0.0 #7 Not tainted
[ 87.675549] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 87.681723] bash/2986 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 87.686337] 000000005ea0e178 (kn->count#58){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0
[ 87.694528]
[ 87.694528] but task is already holding lock:
[ 87.700353] 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c
[ 87.707405]
[ 87.707405] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 87.707405]
[ 87.715574]
[ 87.715574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 87.723048]
[ 87.723048] -> #1 (pwm_lock){+.+.}:
[ 87.728017] __mutex_lock+0x70/0x7e4
[ 87.732108] mutex_lock_nested+0x1c/0x24
[ 87.736547] pwm_request_from_chip.part.6+0x34/0x74
[ 87.741940] pwm_request_from_chip+0x20/0x40
[ 87.746725] export_store+0x6c/0x1f4
[ 87.750820] dev_attr_store+0x18/0x28
[ 87.754998] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64
[ 87.759175] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8
[ 87.763615] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184
[ 87.767619] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c
[ 87.771448] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc
[ 87.775278] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[ 87.779721] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124
[ 87.783986] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24
[ 87.788858] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18
[ 87.792947]
[ 87.792947] -> #0 (kn->count#58){++++}:
[ 87.798260] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c
[ 87.802353] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4
[ 87.806790] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0
[ 87.811836] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78
[ 87.816447] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98
[ 87.820971] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c
[ 87.825583] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c
[ 87.830197] device_del+0x11c/0x33c
[ 87.834201] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c
[ 87.838638] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c
[ 87.843509] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c
[ 87.847773] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34
[ 87.852039] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64
[ 87.856651] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c
[ 87.862391] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c
[ 87.867175] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124
[ 87.871265] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30
[ 87.875442] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64
[ 87.879618] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8
[ 87.884055] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184
[ 87.888057] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c
[ 87.891887] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc
[ 87.895716] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[ 87.900154] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124
[ 87.904417] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24
[ 87.909289] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18
[ 87.913378]
[ 87.913378] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 87.913378]
[ 87.921374] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 87.921374]
[ 87.927286] CPU0 CPU1
[ 87.931808] ---- ----
[ 87.936331] lock(pwm_lock);
[ 87.939293] lock(kn->count#58);
[ 87.945120] lock(pwm_lock);
[ 87.950599] lock(kn->count#58);
[ 87.953908]
[ 87.953908] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 87.953908]
[ 87.959821] 4 locks held by bash/2986:
[ 87.963563] #0: 00000000ace7bc30 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x188/0x19c
[ 87.971044] #1: 00000000287991b2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xb4/0x1e8
[ 87.978872] #2: 00000000f739d016 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x40/0x21c
[ 87.988001] #3: 000000006313b17c (pwm_lock){+.+.}, at: pwmchip_remove+0x28/0x13c
[ 87.995481]
[ 87.995481] stack backtrace:
[ 87.999836] CPU: 0 PID: 2986 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.0.0 #7
[ 88.005489] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X board based on r8a7795 ES1.x (DT)
[ 88.012791] Call trace:
[ 88.015235] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190
[ 88.018891] show_stack+0x14/0x1c
[ 88.022204] dump_stack+0xb0/0xec
[ 88.025514] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x1d0/0x2e0
[ 88.030385] __lock_acquire+0x1318/0x1864
[ 88.034388] lock_acquire+0xc4/0x22c
[ 88.037958] __kernfs_remove+0x258/0x2c4
[ 88.041874] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x50/0xa0
[ 88.046398] remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0x78
[ 88.050487] sysfs_remove_group+0x48/0x98
[ 88.054490] sysfs_remove_groups+0x34/0x4c
[ 88.058580] device_remove_attrs+0x6c/0x7c
[ 88.062671] device_del+0x11c/0x33c
[ 88.066154] device_unregister+0x14/0x2c
[ 88.070070] pwmchip_sysfs_unexport+0x40/0x4c
[ 88.074421] pwmchip_remove+0xf4/0x13c
[ 88.078163] rcar_pwm_remove+0x28/0x34
[ 88.081906] platform_drv_remove+0x24/0x64
[ 88.085996] device_release_driver_internal+0x18c/0x21c
[ 88.091215] device_release_driver+0x14/0x1c
[ 88.095478] unbind_store+0xe0/0x124
[ 88.099048] drv_attr_store+0x20/0x30
[ 88.102704] sysfs_kf_write+0x54/0x64
[ 88.106359] kernfs_fop_write+0xe4/0x1e8
[ 88.110275] __vfs_write+0x40/0x184
[ 88.113757] vfs_write+0xa8/0x19c
[ 88.117065] ksys_write+0x58/0xbc
[ 88.120374] __arm64_sys_write+0x18/0x20
[ 88.124291] el0_svc_common+0xd0/0x124
[ 88.128034] el0_svc_compat_handler+0x1c/0x24
[ 88.132384] el0_svc_compat+0x8/0x18
The sysfs unexport in pwmchip_remove() is completely asymmetric
to what we do in pwmchip_add_with_polarity() and commit 0733424c9ba9
("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal") is a strong indication
that this was wrong to begin with. We should just move
pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() where it belongs, which is right after
pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children(). In that case, we do not need
separate functions anymore either.
We also really want to remove sysfs irrespective of whether or not
the chip will be removed as a result of pwmchip_remove(). We can only
assume that the driver will be gone after that, so we shouldn't leave
any dangling sysfs files around.
This warning disappears if we move pwmchip_sysfs_unexport() to
the top of pwmchip_remove(), pwmchip_sysfs_unexport_children().
That way it is also outside of the pwm_lock section, which indeed
doesn't seem to be needed.
Moving the pwmchip_sysfs_export() call outside of that section also
seems fine and it'd be perfectly symmetric with pwmchip_remove() again.
So, this patch fixes them.
Signed-off-by: Phong Hoang <phong.hoang.wz@renesas.com>
[shimoda: revise the commit log and code]
Fixes: 76abbdde2d95 ("pwm: Add sysfs interface")
Fixes: 0733424c9ba9 ("pwm: Unexport children before chip removal")
Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Tested-by: Hoan Nguyen An <na-hoan@jinso.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Fixes: 400816f60c54 ("perf/x86/intel: Implement support for TSX Force Abort")
Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190313184243.GA10820@lkp-sb-ep06
|
|
When this .gitignore was added, lxdialog was an independent hostprogs-y.
Now that all objects in lxdialog/ are directly linked to mconf, the
lxdialog is no longer generated.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
Currently, every arch/*/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild explicitly includes
the common Kbuild.asm file. Factor out the duplicated include directives
to scripts/Makefile.asm-generic so that no architecture would opt out
of the mandatory-y mechanism.
um is not forced to include mandatory-y since it is a very exceptional
case which does not support UAPI.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
The generic-y is redundant under the following condition:
- arch has its own implementation
- the same header is added to generated-y
- the same header is added to mandatory-y
If a redundant generic-y is found, the warning like follows is displayed:
scripts/Makefile.asm-generic:20: redundant generic-y found in arch/arm/include/asm/Kbuild: timex.h
I fixed up arch Kbuild files found by this.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
This reverts commit caf6fe91ddf62a96401e21e9b7a07227440f4185.
The commit was fine but is no longer needed as of commit 3a2429e1faf4
("kbuild: change if_changed_rule for multi-line recipe"). Let's go
back to using ";" to be consistent.
For some discussion, see:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAK7LNASde0Q9S5GKeQiWhArfER4S4wL1=R_FW8q0++_X3T5=hQ@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
During a simple no-op (nothing changed) build I saw 39 invocations of
the C compiler with the argument "-print-file-name=include". We don't
need to call the C compiler 39 times for this--one time will suffice.
Let's change NOSTDINC_FLAGS to a simply expanded variable to avoid
this since there doesn't appear to be any reason it should be
recursively expanded.
On my build this shaved ~400 ms off my "no-op" build.
Note that the recursive expansion seems to date back to the (really
old) commit e8f5bdb02ce0 ("[PATCH] Makefile include path ordering").
It's a little unclear to me if the point of that patch was to switch
the variable to be recursively expanded (which it did) or to avoid
directly assigning to NOSTDINC_FLAGS (AKA to switch to +=) because
someone else (out of tree?) was setting it. I presume later since if
the only goal was to switch to recursive expansion the patch would
have just removed the ":".
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
|
* The man page for dpkg-source(1) notes:
> -b, --build directory [format-specific-parameters]
> Build a source package (--build since dpkg 1.17.14).
> <...>
>
> dpkg-source will build the source package with the first
> format found in this ordered list: the format indicated
> with the --format command line option, the format
> indicated in debian/source/format, “1.0”. The fallback
> to “1.0” is deprecated and will be removed at some point
> in the future, you should always document the desired
> source format in debian/source/format. See section
> SOURCE PACKAGE FORMATS for an extensive description of
> the various source package formats.
Thus it would be more foolproof to explicitly use 1.0 (as we always
did) than to rely on dpkg-source's defaults.
* In a similar vein, debian/rules is not made executable by mkdebian,
and dpkg-source warns about that but still silently fixes the file.
Let's be explicit once again.
Signed-off-by: Arseny Maslennikov <ar@cs.msu.ru>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
|
