From 180486b430f4e22cc00a478163d942804baae4b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 10:07:04 +0000 Subject: bpf, selftests: Add test case for atomic fetch on spilled pointer Test whether unprivileged would be able to leak the spilled pointer either by exporting the returned value from the atomic{32,64} operation or by reading and exporting the value from the stack after the atomic operation took place. Note that for unprivileged, the below atomic cmpxchg test case named "Dest pointer in r0 - succeed" is failing. The reason is that in the dst memory location (r10 -8) there is the spilled register r10: 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 0: (bf) r0 = r10 1: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r0 2: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp 2: (b7) r1 = 0 3: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp 3: (db) r0 = atomic64_cmpxchg((u64 *)(r10 -8), r0, r1) 4: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm 4: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r0 -8) 5: R0_w=fp0 R1_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm 5: (b7) r0 = 0 6: R0_w=invP0 R1_w=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm 6: (95) exit However, allowing this case for unprivileged is a bit useless given an update with a new pointer will fail anyway: 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 0: (bf) r0 = r10 1: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 1: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r0 2: R0_w=fp0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 fp-8_w=fp 2: (db) r0 = atomic64_cmpxchg((u64 *)(r10 -8), r0, r10) R10 leaks addr into mem Acked-by: Brendan Jackman Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- .../selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c | 23 ++++++ .../testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 117 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c index c22dc83a41fd..0ffc69f602af 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c @@ -156,4 +156,27 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", +}, +{ + "Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 2", + .insns = { + /* r0 = &val */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10), + /* val = r0; */ + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* r5 = &val */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10), + /* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, r5); */ + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_5, -8), + /* r1 = *r0 */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8), + /* exit(0); */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R5 leaks addr into mem", }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c index 3bc9ff7a860b..5bf03fb4fa2b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_fetch.c @@ -1,3 +1,97 @@ +{ + "atomic dw/fetch and address leakage of (map ptr & -1) via stack slot", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_8, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 2, 4 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", +}, +{ + "atomic dw/fetch and address leakage of (map ptr & -1) via returned value", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_8, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_DW, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 2, 4 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", +}, +{ + "atomic w/fetch and address leakage of (map ptr & -1) via stack slot", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_8, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 2, 4 }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "invalid size of register fill", +}, +{ + "atomic w/fetch and address leakage of (map ptr & -1) via returned value", + .insns = { + BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_8, 0), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_9, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 2, 4 }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "invalid size of register fill", +}, #define __ATOMIC_FETCH_OP_TEST(src_reg, dst_reg, operand1, op, operand2, expect) \ { \ "atomic fetch " #op ", src=" #dst_reg " dst=" #dst_reg, \ -- cgit v1.2.3