From 3cb4f09fc2e98bbf26f8c900a94bf3910cd4d823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Brownell Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:20:40 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] mtd_dataflash, fix block vs page erase Fix a bug in the block-erase optimization for Dataflash; it was using block erase even for smaller segments that need page erase. That wouldn't matter for JFFS2, which never erases less than one block (sometimes several blocks), but for other callers it might. Signed-off-by: David Brownell Acked-by: David Woodhouse Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c index 155737e7483f..a19480d07888 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/mtd_dataflash.c @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static int dataflash_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr) * we're at a block boundary and need to erase the whole block. */ pageaddr = instr->addr / priv->page_size; - do_block = (pageaddr & 0x7) == 0 && instr->len <= blocksize; + do_block = (pageaddr & 0x7) == 0 && instr->len >= blocksize; pageaddr = pageaddr << priv->page_offset; command[0] = do_block ? OP_ERASE_BLOCK : OP_ERASE_PAGE; -- cgit v1.2.3