From 4d3beaa06d3536aa8968d1828a66bd5ccb5036ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 21:39:29 -0300 Subject: docs: security: move some books to it and update The following files belong to security: Documentation/security/LSM.rst -> Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst Documentation/lsm.txt -> Documentation/security/lsm.rst Documentation/SAK.txt -> Documentation/security/sak.rst Documentation/siphash.txt -> Documentation/security/siphash.rst Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- Documentation/SAK.txt | 91 ------------- Documentation/lsm.txt | 201 ---------------------------- Documentation/security/LSM.rst | 17 --- Documentation/security/index.rst | 5 +- Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst | 17 +++ Documentation/security/lsm.rst | 201 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/security/sak.rst | 91 +++++++++++++ Documentation/security/siphash.rst | 189 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/security/tpm/index.rst | 1 + Documentation/security/tpm/xen-tpmfront.rst | 2 - Documentation/siphash.txt | 189 -------------------------- 11 files changed, 503 insertions(+), 501 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/SAK.txt delete mode 100644 Documentation/lsm.txt delete mode 100644 Documentation/security/LSM.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/security/lsm.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/security/sak.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/security/siphash.rst delete mode 100644 Documentation/siphash.txt (limited to 'Documentation') diff --git a/Documentation/SAK.txt b/Documentation/SAK.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 260e1d3687bd..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/SAK.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,91 +0,0 @@ -========================================= -Linux Secure Attention Key (SAK) handling -========================================= - -:Date: 18 March 2001 -:Author: Andrew Morton - -An operating system's Secure Attention Key is a security tool which is -provided as protection against trojan password capturing programs. It -is an undefeatable way of killing all programs which could be -masquerading as login applications. Users need to be taught to enter -this key sequence before they log in to the system. - -From the PC keyboard, Linux has two similar but different ways of -providing SAK. One is the ALT-SYSRQ-K sequence. You shouldn't use -this sequence. It is only available if the kernel was compiled with -sysrq support. - -The proper way of generating a SAK is to define the key sequence using -``loadkeys``. This will work whether or not sysrq support is compiled -into the kernel. - -SAK works correctly when the keyboard is in raw mode. This means that -once defined, SAK will kill a running X server. If the system is in -run level 5, the X server will restart. This is what you want to -happen. - -What key sequence should you use? Well, CTRL-ALT-DEL is used to reboot -the machine. CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE is magical to the X server. We'll -choose CTRL-ALT-PAUSE. - -In your rc.sysinit (or rc.local) file, add the command:: - - echo "control alt keycode 101 = SAK" | /bin/loadkeys - -And that's it! Only the superuser may reprogram the SAK key. - - -.. note:: - - 1. Linux SAK is said to be not a "true SAK" as is required by - systems which implement C2 level security. This author does not - know why. - - - 2. On the PC keyboard, SAK kills all applications which have - /dev/console opened. - - Unfortunately this includes a number of things which you don't - actually want killed. This is because these applications are - incorrectly holding /dev/console open. Be sure to complain to your - Linux distributor about this! - - You can identify processes which will be killed by SAK with the - command:: - - # ls -l /proc/[0-9]*/fd/* | grep console - l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Mar 18 00:46 /proc/579/fd/0 -> /dev/console - - Then:: - - # ps aux|grep 579 - root 579 0.0 0.1 1088 436 ? S 00:43 0:00 gpm -t ps/2 - - So ``gpm`` will be killed by SAK. This is a bug in gpm. It should - be closing standard input. You can work around this by finding the - initscript which launches gpm and changing it thusly: - - Old:: - - daemon gpm - - New:: - - daemon gpm < /dev/null - - Vixie cron also seems to have this problem, and needs the same treatment. - - Also, one prominent Linux distribution has the following three - lines in its rc.sysinit and rc scripts:: - - exec 3<&0 - exec 4>&1 - exec 5>&2 - - These commands cause **all** daemons which are launched by the - initscripts to have file descriptors 3, 4 and 5 attached to - /dev/console. So SAK kills them all. A workaround is to simply - delete these lines, but this may cause system management - applications to malfunction - test everything well. - diff --git a/Documentation/lsm.txt b/Documentation/lsm.txt deleted file mode 100644 index ad4dfd020e0d..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/lsm.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,201 +0,0 @@ -======================================================== -Linux Security Modules: General Security Hooks for Linux -======================================================== - -:Author: Stephen Smalley -:Author: Timothy Fraser -:Author: Chris Vance - -.. note:: - - The APIs described in this book are outdated. - -Introduction -============ - -In March 2001, the National Security Agency (NSA) gave a presentation -about Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) at the 2.5 Linux Kernel Summit. -SELinux is an implementation of flexible and fine-grained -nondiscretionary access controls in the Linux kernel, originally -implemented as its own particular kernel patch. Several other security -projects (e.g. RSBAC, Medusa) have also developed flexible access -control architectures for the Linux kernel, and various projects have -developed particular access control models for Linux (e.g. LIDS, DTE, -SubDomain). Each project has developed and maintained its own kernel -patch to support its security needs. - -In response to the NSA presentation, Linus Torvalds made a set of -remarks that described a security framework he would be willing to -consider for inclusion in the mainstream Linux kernel. He described a -general framework that would provide a set of security hooks to control -operations on kernel objects and a set of opaque security fields in -kernel data structures for maintaining security attributes. This -framework could then be used by loadable kernel modules to implement any -desired model of security. Linus also suggested the possibility of -migrating the Linux capabilities code into such a module. - -The Linux Security Modules (LSM) project was started by WireX to develop -such a framework. LSM is a joint development effort by several security -projects, including Immunix, SELinux, SGI and Janus, and several -individuals, including Greg Kroah-Hartman and James Morris, to develop a -Linux kernel patch that implements this framework. The patch is -currently tracking the 2.4 series and is targeted for integration into -the 2.5 development series. This technical report provides an overview -of the framework and the example capabilities security module provided -by the LSM kernel patch. - -LSM Framework -============= - -The LSM kernel patch provides a general kernel framework to support -security modules. In particular, the LSM framework is primarily focused -on supporting access control modules, although future development is -likely to address other security needs such as auditing. By itself, the -framework does not provide any additional security; it merely provides -the infrastructure to support security modules. The LSM kernel patch -also moves most of the capabilities logic into an optional security -module, with the system defaulting to the traditional superuser logic. -This capabilities module is discussed further in -`LSM Capabilities Module <#cap>`__. - -The LSM kernel patch adds security fields to kernel data structures and -inserts calls to hook functions at critical points in the kernel code to -manage the security fields and to perform access control. It also adds -functions for registering and unregistering security modules, and adds a -general :c:func:`security()` system call to support new system calls -for security-aware applications. - -The LSM security fields are simply ``void*`` pointers. For process and -program execution security information, security fields were added to -:c:type:`struct task_struct ` and -:c:type:`struct linux_binprm `. For filesystem -security information, a security field was added to :c:type:`struct -super_block `. For pipe, file, and socket security -information, security fields were added to :c:type:`struct inode -` and :c:type:`struct file `. For packet and -network device security information, security fields were added to -:c:type:`struct sk_buff ` and :c:type:`struct -net_device `. For System V IPC security information, -security fields were added to :c:type:`struct kern_ipc_perm -` and :c:type:`struct msg_msg -`; additionally, the definitions for :c:type:`struct -msg_msg `, struct msg_queue, and struct shmid_kernel -were moved to header files (``include/linux/msg.h`` and -``include/linux/shm.h`` as appropriate) to allow the security modules to -use these definitions. - -Each LSM hook is a function pointer in a global table, security_ops. -This table is a :c:type:`struct security_operations -` structure as defined by -``include/linux/security.h``. Detailed documentation for each hook is -included in this header file. At present, this structure consists of a -collection of substructures that group related hooks based on the kernel -object (e.g. task, inode, file, sk_buff, etc) as well as some top-level -hook function pointers for system operations. This structure is likely -to be flattened in the future for performance. The placement of the hook -calls in the kernel code is described by the "called:" lines in the -per-hook documentation in the header file. The hook calls can also be -easily found in the kernel code by looking for the string -"security_ops->". - -Linus mentioned per-process security hooks in his original remarks as a -possible alternative to global security hooks. However, if LSM were to -start from the perspective of per-process hooks, then the base framework -would have to deal with how to handle operations that involve multiple -processes (e.g. kill), since each process might have its own hook for -controlling the operation. This would require a general mechanism for -composing hooks in the base framework. Additionally, LSM would still -need global hooks for operations that have no process context (e.g. -network input operations). Consequently, LSM provides global security -hooks, but a security module is free to implement per-process hooks -(where that makes sense) by storing a security_ops table in each -process' security field and then invoking these per-process hooks from -the global hooks. The problem of composition is thus deferred to the -module. - -The global security_ops table is initialized to a set of hook functions -provided by a dummy security module that provides traditional superuser -logic. A :c:func:`register_security()` function (in -``security/security.c``) is provided to allow a security module to set -security_ops to refer to its own hook functions, and an -:c:func:`unregister_security()` function is provided to revert -security_ops to the dummy module hooks. This mechanism is used to set -the primary security module, which is responsible for making the final -decision for each hook. - -LSM also provides a simple mechanism for stacking additional security -modules with the primary security module. It defines -:c:func:`register_security()` and -:c:func:`unregister_security()` hooks in the :c:type:`struct -security_operations ` structure and -provides :c:func:`mod_reg_security()` and -:c:func:`mod_unreg_security()` functions that invoke these hooks -after performing some sanity checking. A security module can call these -functions in order to stack with other modules. However, the actual -details of how this stacking is handled are deferred to the module, -which can implement these hooks in any way it wishes (including always -returning an error if it does not wish to support stacking). In this -manner, LSM again defers the problem of composition to the module. - -Although the LSM hooks are organized into substructures based on kernel -object, all of the hooks can be viewed as falling into two major -categories: hooks that are used to manage the security fields and hooks -that are used to perform access control. Examples of the first category -of hooks include the :c:func:`alloc_security()` and -:c:func:`free_security()` hooks defined for each kernel data -structure that has a security field. These hooks are used to allocate -and free security structures for kernel objects. The first category of -hooks also includes hooks that set information in the security field -after allocation, such as the :c:func:`post_lookup()` hook in -:c:type:`struct inode_security_ops `. -This hook is used to set security information for inodes after -successful lookup operations. An example of the second category of hooks -is the :c:func:`permission()` hook in :c:type:`struct -inode_security_ops `. This hook checks -permission when accessing an inode. - -LSM Capabilities Module -======================= - -The LSM kernel patch moves most of the existing POSIX.1e capabilities -logic into an optional security module stored in the file -``security/capability.c``. This change allows users who do not want to -use capabilities to omit this code entirely from their kernel, instead -using the dummy module for traditional superuser logic or any other -module that they desire. This change also allows the developers of the -capabilities logic to maintain and enhance their code more freely, -without needing to integrate patches back into the base kernel. - -In addition to moving the capabilities logic, the LSM kernel patch could -move the capability-related fields from the kernel data structures into -the new security fields managed by the security modules. However, at -present, the LSM kernel patch leaves the capability fields in the kernel -data structures. In his original remarks, Linus suggested that this -might be preferable so that other security modules can be easily stacked -with the capabilities module without needing to chain multiple security -structures on the security field. It also avoids imposing extra overhead -on the capabilities module to manage the security fields. However, the -LSM framework could certainly support such a move if it is determined to -be desirable, with only a few additional changes described below. - -At present, the capabilities logic for computing process capabilities on -:c:func:`execve()` and :c:func:`set\*uid()`, checking -capabilities for a particular process, saving and checking capabilities -for netlink messages, and handling the :c:func:`capget()` and -:c:func:`capset()` system calls have been moved into the -capabilities module. There are still a few locations in the base kernel -where capability-related fields are directly examined or modified, but -the current version of the LSM patch does allow a security module to -completely replace the assignment and testing of capabilities. These few -locations would need to be changed if the capability-related fields were -moved into the security field. The following is a list of known -locations that still perform such direct examination or modification of -capability-related fields: - -- ``fs/open.c``::c:func:`sys_access()` - -- ``fs/lockd/host.c``::c:func:`nlm_bind_host()` - -- ``fs/nfsd/auth.c``::c:func:`nfsd_setuser()` - -- ``fs/proc/array.c``::c:func:`task_cap()` diff --git a/Documentation/security/LSM.rst b/Documentation/security/LSM.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 31d92bc5fdd2..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/security/LSM.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -================================= -Linux Security Module Development -================================= - -Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/26/215, -a new LSM is accepted into the kernel when its intent (a description of -what it tries to protect against and in what cases one would expect to -use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/``. -This allows an LSM's code to be easily compared to its goals, and so -that end users and distros can make a more informed decision about which -LSMs suit their requirements. - -For extensive documentation on the available LSM hook interfaces, please -see ``include/linux/lsm_hooks.h`` and associated structures: - -.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/lsm_hooks.h - :internal: diff --git a/Documentation/security/index.rst b/Documentation/security/index.rst index aad6d92ffe31..fc503dd689a7 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/index.rst @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ Security Documentation credentials IMA-templates keys/index - LSM + lsm + lsm-development + sak SCTP self-protection + siphash tpm/index diff --git a/Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst b/Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..31d92bc5fdd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/security/lsm-development.rst @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +================================= +Linux Security Module Development +================================= + +Based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/26/215, +a new LSM is accepted into the kernel when its intent (a description of +what it tries to protect against and in what cases one would expect to +use it) has been appropriately documented in ``Documentation/admin-guide/LSM/``. +This allows an LSM's code to be easily compared to its goals, and so +that end users and distros can make a more informed decision about which +LSMs suit their requirements. + +For extensive documentation on the available LSM hook interfaces, please +see ``include/linux/lsm_hooks.h`` and associated structures: + +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/lsm_hooks.h + :internal: diff --git a/Documentation/security/lsm.rst b/Documentation/security/lsm.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ad4dfd020e0d --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/security/lsm.rst @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@ +======================================================== +Linux Security Modules: General Security Hooks for Linux +======================================================== + +:Author: Stephen Smalley +:Author: Timothy Fraser +:Author: Chris Vance + +.. note:: + + The APIs described in this book are outdated. + +Introduction +============ + +In March 2001, the National Security Agency (NSA) gave a presentation +about Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) at the 2.5 Linux Kernel Summit. +SELinux is an implementation of flexible and fine-grained +nondiscretionary access controls in the Linux kernel, originally +implemented as its own particular kernel patch. Several other security +projects (e.g. RSBAC, Medusa) have also developed flexible access +control architectures for the Linux kernel, and various projects have +developed particular access control models for Linux (e.g. LIDS, DTE, +SubDomain). Each project has developed and maintained its own kernel +patch to support its security needs. + +In response to the NSA presentation, Linus Torvalds made a set of +remarks that described a security framework he would be willing to +consider for inclusion in the mainstream Linux kernel. He described a +general framework that would provide a set of security hooks to control +operations on kernel objects and a set of opaque security fields in +kernel data structures for maintaining security attributes. This +framework could then be used by loadable kernel modules to implement any +desired model of security. Linus also suggested the possibility of +migrating the Linux capabilities code into such a module. + +The Linux Security Modules (LSM) project was started by WireX to develop +such a framework. LSM is a joint development effort by several security +projects, including Immunix, SELinux, SGI and Janus, and several +individuals, including Greg Kroah-Hartman and James Morris, to develop a +Linux kernel patch that implements this framework. The patch is +currently tracking the 2.4 series and is targeted for integration into +the 2.5 development series. This technical report provides an overview +of the framework and the example capabilities security module provided +by the LSM kernel patch. + +LSM Framework +============= + +The LSM kernel patch provides a general kernel framework to support +security modules. In particular, the LSM framework is primarily focused +on supporting access control modules, although future development is +likely to address other security needs such as auditing. By itself, the +framework does not provide any additional security; it merely provides +the infrastructure to support security modules. The LSM kernel patch +also moves most of the capabilities logic into an optional security +module, with the system defaulting to the traditional superuser logic. +This capabilities module is discussed further in +`LSM Capabilities Module <#cap>`__. + +The LSM kernel patch adds security fields to kernel data structures and +inserts calls to hook functions at critical points in the kernel code to +manage the security fields and to perform access control. It also adds +functions for registering and unregistering security modules, and adds a +general :c:func:`security()` system call to support new system calls +for security-aware applications. + +The LSM security fields are simply ``void*`` pointers. For process and +program execution security information, security fields were added to +:c:type:`struct task_struct ` and +:c:type:`struct linux_binprm `. For filesystem +security information, a security field was added to :c:type:`struct +super_block `. For pipe, file, and socket security +information, security fields were added to :c:type:`struct inode +` and :c:type:`struct file `. For packet and +network device security information, security fields were added to +:c:type:`struct sk_buff ` and :c:type:`struct +net_device `. For System V IPC security information, +security fields were added to :c:type:`struct kern_ipc_perm +` and :c:type:`struct msg_msg +`; additionally, the definitions for :c:type:`struct +msg_msg `, struct msg_queue, and struct shmid_kernel +were moved to header files (``include/linux/msg.h`` and +``include/linux/shm.h`` as appropriate) to allow the security modules to +use these definitions. + +Each LSM hook is a function pointer in a global table, security_ops. +This table is a :c:type:`struct security_operations +` structure as defined by +``include/linux/security.h``. Detailed documentation for each hook is +included in this header file. At present, this structure consists of a +collection of substructures that group related hooks based on the kernel +object (e.g. task, inode, file, sk_buff, etc) as well as some top-level +hook function pointers for system operations. This structure is likely +to be flattened in the future for performance. The placement of the hook +calls in the kernel code is described by the "called:" lines in the +per-hook documentation in the header file. The hook calls can also be +easily found in the kernel code by looking for the string +"security_ops->". + +Linus mentioned per-process security hooks in his original remarks as a +possible alternative to global security hooks. However, if LSM were to +start from the perspective of per-process hooks, then the base framework +would have to deal with how to handle operations that involve multiple +processes (e.g. kill), since each process might have its own hook for +controlling the operation. This would require a general mechanism for +composing hooks in the base framework. Additionally, LSM would still +need global hooks for operations that have no process context (e.g. +network input operations). Consequently, LSM provides global security +hooks, but a security module is free to implement per-process hooks +(where that makes sense) by storing a security_ops table in each +process' security field and then invoking these per-process hooks from +the global hooks. The problem of composition is thus deferred to the +module. + +The global security_ops table is initialized to a set of hook functions +provided by a dummy security module that provides traditional superuser +logic. A :c:func:`register_security()` function (in +``security/security.c``) is provided to allow a security module to set +security_ops to refer to its own hook functions, and an +:c:func:`unregister_security()` function is provided to revert +security_ops to the dummy module hooks. This mechanism is used to set +the primary security module, which is responsible for making the final +decision for each hook. + +LSM also provides a simple mechanism for stacking additional security +modules with the primary security module. It defines +:c:func:`register_security()` and +:c:func:`unregister_security()` hooks in the :c:type:`struct +security_operations ` structure and +provides :c:func:`mod_reg_security()` and +:c:func:`mod_unreg_security()` functions that invoke these hooks +after performing some sanity checking. A security module can call these +functions in order to stack with other modules. However, the actual +details of how this stacking is handled are deferred to the module, +which can implement these hooks in any way it wishes (including always +returning an error if it does not wish to support stacking). In this +manner, LSM again defers the problem of composition to the module. + +Although the LSM hooks are organized into substructures based on kernel +object, all of the hooks can be viewed as falling into two major +categories: hooks that are used to manage the security fields and hooks +that are used to perform access control. Examples of the first category +of hooks include the :c:func:`alloc_security()` and +:c:func:`free_security()` hooks defined for each kernel data +structure that has a security field. These hooks are used to allocate +and free security structures for kernel objects. The first category of +hooks also includes hooks that set information in the security field +after allocation, such as the :c:func:`post_lookup()` hook in +:c:type:`struct inode_security_ops `. +This hook is used to set security information for inodes after +successful lookup operations. An example of the second category of hooks +is the :c:func:`permission()` hook in :c:type:`struct +inode_security_ops `. This hook checks +permission when accessing an inode. + +LSM Capabilities Module +======================= + +The LSM kernel patch moves most of the existing POSIX.1e capabilities +logic into an optional security module stored in the file +``security/capability.c``. This change allows users who do not want to +use capabilities to omit this code entirely from their kernel, instead +using the dummy module for traditional superuser logic or any other +module that they desire. This change also allows the developers of the +capabilities logic to maintain and enhance their code more freely, +without needing to integrate patches back into the base kernel. + +In addition to moving the capabilities logic, the LSM kernel patch could +move the capability-related fields from the kernel data structures into +the new security fields managed by the security modules. However, at +present, the LSM kernel patch leaves the capability fields in the kernel +data structures. In his original remarks, Linus suggested that this +might be preferable so that other security modules can be easily stacked +with the capabilities module without needing to chain multiple security +structures on the security field. It also avoids imposing extra overhead +on the capabilities module to manage the security fields. However, the +LSM framework could certainly support such a move if it is determined to +be desirable, with only a few additional changes described below. + +At present, the capabilities logic for computing process capabilities on +:c:func:`execve()` and :c:func:`set\*uid()`, checking +capabilities for a particular process, saving and checking capabilities +for netlink messages, and handling the :c:func:`capget()` and +:c:func:`capset()` system calls have been moved into the +capabilities module. There are still a few locations in the base kernel +where capability-related fields are directly examined or modified, but +the current version of the LSM patch does allow a security module to +completely replace the assignment and testing of capabilities. These few +locations would need to be changed if the capability-related fields were +moved into the security field. The following is a list of known +locations that still perform such direct examination or modification of +capability-related fields: + +- ``fs/open.c``::c:func:`sys_access()` + +- ``fs/lockd/host.c``::c:func:`nlm_bind_host()` + +- ``fs/nfsd/auth.c``::c:func:`nfsd_setuser()` + +- ``fs/proc/array.c``::c:func:`task_cap()` diff --git a/Documentation/security/sak.rst b/Documentation/security/sak.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..260e1d3687bd --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/security/sak.rst @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +========================================= +Linux Secure Attention Key (SAK) handling +========================================= + +:Date: 18 March 2001 +:Author: Andrew Morton + +An operating system's Secure Attention Key is a security tool which is +provided as protection against trojan password capturing programs. It +is an undefeatable way of killing all programs which could be +masquerading as login applications. Users need to be taught to enter +this key sequence before they log in to the system. + +From the PC keyboard, Linux has two similar but different ways of +providing SAK. One is the ALT-SYSRQ-K sequence. You shouldn't use +this sequence. It is only available if the kernel was compiled with +sysrq support. + +The proper way of generating a SAK is to define the key sequence using +``loadkeys``. This will work whether or not sysrq support is compiled +into the kernel. + +SAK works correctly when the keyboard is in raw mode. This means that +once defined, SAK will kill a running X server. If the system is in +run level 5, the X server will restart. This is what you want to +happen. + +What key sequence should you use? Well, CTRL-ALT-DEL is used to reboot +the machine. CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE is magical to the X server. We'll +choose CTRL-ALT-PAUSE. + +In your rc.sysinit (or rc.local) file, add the command:: + + echo "control alt keycode 101 = SAK" | /bin/loadkeys + +And that's it! Only the superuser may reprogram the SAK key. + + +.. note:: + + 1. Linux SAK is said to be not a "true SAK" as is required by + systems which implement C2 level security. This author does not + know why. + + + 2. On the PC keyboard, SAK kills all applications which have + /dev/console opened. + + Unfortunately this includes a number of things which you don't + actually want killed. This is because these applications are + incorrectly holding /dev/console open. Be sure to complain to your + Linux distributor about this! + + You can identify processes which will be killed by SAK with the + command:: + + # ls -l /proc/[0-9]*/fd/* | grep console + l-wx------ 1 root root 64 Mar 18 00:46 /proc/579/fd/0 -> /dev/console + + Then:: + + # ps aux|grep 579 + root 579 0.0 0.1 1088 436 ? S 00:43 0:00 gpm -t ps/2 + + So ``gpm`` will be killed by SAK. This is a bug in gpm. It should + be closing standard input. You can work around this by finding the + initscript which launches gpm and changing it thusly: + + Old:: + + daemon gpm + + New:: + + daemon gpm < /dev/null + + Vixie cron also seems to have this problem, and needs the same treatment. + + Also, one prominent Linux distribution has the following three + lines in its rc.sysinit and rc scripts:: + + exec 3<&0 + exec 4>&1 + exec 5>&2 + + These commands cause **all** daemons which are launched by the + initscripts to have file descriptors 3, 4 and 5 attached to + /dev/console. So SAK kills them all. A workaround is to simply + delete these lines, but this may cause system management + applications to malfunction - test everything well. + diff --git a/Documentation/security/siphash.rst b/Documentation/security/siphash.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9965821ab333 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/security/siphash.rst @@ -0,0 +1,189 @@ +=========================== +SipHash - a short input PRF +=========================== + +:Author: Written by Jason A. Donenfeld + +SipHash is a cryptographically secure PRF -- a keyed hash function -- that +performs very well for short inputs, hence the name. It was designed by +cryptographers Daniel J. Bernstein and Jean-Philippe Aumasson. It is intended +as a replacement for some uses of: `jhash`, `md5_transform`, `sha_transform`, +and so forth. + +SipHash takes a secret key filled with randomly generated numbers and either +an input buffer or several input integers. It spits out an integer that is +indistinguishable from random. You may then use that integer as part of secure +sequence numbers, secure cookies, or mask it off for use in a hash table. + +Generating a key +================ + +Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of +random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once:: + + siphash_key_t key; + get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key)); + +If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong. + +Using the functions +=================== + +There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and +one that takes a buffer:: + + u64 siphash(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key); + +And:: + + u64 siphash_1u64(u64, const siphash_key_t *key); + u64 siphash_2u64(u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); + u64 siphash_3u64(u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); + u64 siphash_4u64(u64, u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); + u64 siphash_1u32(u32, const siphash_key_t *key); + u64 siphash_2u32(u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); + u64 siphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); + u64 siphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); + +If you pass the generic siphash function something of a constant length, it +will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the +optimized functions. + +Hashtable key function usage:: + + struct some_hashtable { + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8); + siphash_key_t key; + }; + + void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table) + { + get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key)); + } + + static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input) + { + return &table->hashtable[siphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)]; + } + +You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket. + +Security +======== + +SipHash has a very high security margin, with its 128-bit key. So long as the +key is kept secret, it is impossible for an attacker to guess the outputs of +the function, even if being able to observe many outputs, since 2^128 outputs +is significant. + +Linux implements the "2-4" variant of SipHash. + +Struct-passing Pitfalls +======================= + +Often times the XuY functions will not be large enough, and instead you'll +want to pass a pre-filled struct to siphash. When doing this, it's important +to always ensure the struct has no padding holes. The easiest way to do this +is to simply arrange the members of the struct in descending order of size, +and to use offsetendof() instead of sizeof() for getting the size. For +performance reasons, if possible, it's probably a good thing to align the +struct to the right boundary. Here's an example:: + + const struct { + struct in6_addr saddr; + u32 counter; + u16 dport; + } __aligned(SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT) combined = { + .saddr = *(struct in6_addr *)saddr, + .counter = counter, + .dport = dport + }; + u64 h = siphash(&combined, offsetofend(typeof(combined), dport), &secret); + +Resources +========= + +Read the SipHash paper if you're interested in learning more: +https://131002.net/siphash/siphash.pdf + +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +=============================================== +HalfSipHash - SipHash's insecure younger cousin +=============================================== + +:Author: Written by Jason A. Donenfeld + +On the off-chance that SipHash is not fast enough for your needs, you might be +able to justify using HalfSipHash, a terrifying but potentially useful +possibility. HalfSipHash cuts SipHash's rounds down from "2-4" to "1-3" and, +even scarier, uses an easily brute-forcable 64-bit key (with a 32-bit output) +instead of SipHash's 128-bit key. However, this may appeal to some +high-performance `jhash` users. + +Danger! + +Do not ever use HalfSipHash except for as a hashtable key function, and only +then when you can be absolutely certain that the outputs will never be +transmitted out of the kernel. This is only remotely useful over `jhash` as a +means of mitigating hashtable flooding denial of service attacks. + +Generating a key +================ + +Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of +random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once: + +hsiphash_key_t key; +get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key)); + +If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong. + +Using the functions +=================== + +There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and +one that takes a buffer:: + + u32 hsiphash(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key); + +And:: + + u32 hsiphash_1u32(u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); + u32 hsiphash_2u32(u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); + u32 hsiphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); + u32 hsiphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); + +If you pass the generic hsiphash function something of a constant length, it +will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the +optimized functions. + +Hashtable key function usage +============================ + +:: + + struct some_hashtable { + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8); + hsiphash_key_t key; + }; + + void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table) + { + get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key)); + } + + static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input) + { + return &table->hashtable[hsiphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)]; + } + +You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket. + +Performance +=========== + +HalfSipHash is roughly 3 times slower than JenkinsHash. For many replacements, +this will not be a problem, as the hashtable lookup isn't the bottleneck. And +in general, this is probably a good sacrifice to make for the security and DoS +resistance of HalfSipHash. diff --git a/Documentation/security/tpm/index.rst b/Documentation/security/tpm/index.rst index af77a7bbb070..3296533e54cf 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/tpm/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/tpm/index.rst @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ Trusted Platform Module documentation .. toctree:: tpm_vtpm_proxy + xen-tpmfront diff --git a/Documentation/security/tpm/xen-tpmfront.rst b/Documentation/security/tpm/xen-tpmfront.rst index 98a16ab87360..00d5b1db227d 100644 --- a/Documentation/security/tpm/xen-tpmfront.rst +++ b/Documentation/security/tpm/xen-tpmfront.rst @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ -:orphan: - ============================= Virtual TPM interface for Xen ============================= diff --git a/Documentation/siphash.txt b/Documentation/siphash.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 9965821ab333..000000000000 --- a/Documentation/siphash.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,189 +0,0 @@ -=========================== -SipHash - a short input PRF -=========================== - -:Author: Written by Jason A. Donenfeld - -SipHash is a cryptographically secure PRF -- a keyed hash function -- that -performs very well for short inputs, hence the name. It was designed by -cryptographers Daniel J. Bernstein and Jean-Philippe Aumasson. It is intended -as a replacement for some uses of: `jhash`, `md5_transform`, `sha_transform`, -and so forth. - -SipHash takes a secret key filled with randomly generated numbers and either -an input buffer or several input integers. It spits out an integer that is -indistinguishable from random. You may then use that integer as part of secure -sequence numbers, secure cookies, or mask it off for use in a hash table. - -Generating a key -================ - -Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of -random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once:: - - siphash_key_t key; - get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key)); - -If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong. - -Using the functions -=================== - -There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and -one that takes a buffer:: - - u64 siphash(const void *data, size_t len, const siphash_key_t *key); - -And:: - - u64 siphash_1u64(u64, const siphash_key_t *key); - u64 siphash_2u64(u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); - u64 siphash_3u64(u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); - u64 siphash_4u64(u64, u64, u64, u64, const siphash_key_t *key); - u64 siphash_1u32(u32, const siphash_key_t *key); - u64 siphash_2u32(u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); - u64 siphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); - u64 siphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const siphash_key_t *key); - -If you pass the generic siphash function something of a constant length, it -will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the -optimized functions. - -Hashtable key function usage:: - - struct some_hashtable { - DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8); - siphash_key_t key; - }; - - void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table) - { - get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key)); - } - - static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input) - { - return &table->hashtable[siphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)]; - } - -You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket. - -Security -======== - -SipHash has a very high security margin, with its 128-bit key. So long as the -key is kept secret, it is impossible for an attacker to guess the outputs of -the function, even if being able to observe many outputs, since 2^128 outputs -is significant. - -Linux implements the "2-4" variant of SipHash. - -Struct-passing Pitfalls -======================= - -Often times the XuY functions will not be large enough, and instead you'll -want to pass a pre-filled struct to siphash. When doing this, it's important -to always ensure the struct has no padding holes. The easiest way to do this -is to simply arrange the members of the struct in descending order of size, -and to use offsetendof() instead of sizeof() for getting the size. For -performance reasons, if possible, it's probably a good thing to align the -struct to the right boundary. Here's an example:: - - const struct { - struct in6_addr saddr; - u32 counter; - u16 dport; - } __aligned(SIPHASH_ALIGNMENT) combined = { - .saddr = *(struct in6_addr *)saddr, - .counter = counter, - .dport = dport - }; - u64 h = siphash(&combined, offsetofend(typeof(combined), dport), &secret); - -Resources -========= - -Read the SipHash paper if you're interested in learning more: -https://131002.net/siphash/siphash.pdf - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -=============================================== -HalfSipHash - SipHash's insecure younger cousin -=============================================== - -:Author: Written by Jason A. Donenfeld - -On the off-chance that SipHash is not fast enough for your needs, you might be -able to justify using HalfSipHash, a terrifying but potentially useful -possibility. HalfSipHash cuts SipHash's rounds down from "2-4" to "1-3" and, -even scarier, uses an easily brute-forcable 64-bit key (with a 32-bit output) -instead of SipHash's 128-bit key. However, this may appeal to some -high-performance `jhash` users. - -Danger! - -Do not ever use HalfSipHash except for as a hashtable key function, and only -then when you can be absolutely certain that the outputs will never be -transmitted out of the kernel. This is only remotely useful over `jhash` as a -means of mitigating hashtable flooding denial of service attacks. - -Generating a key -================ - -Keys should always be generated from a cryptographically secure source of -random numbers, either using get_random_bytes or get_random_once: - -hsiphash_key_t key; -get_random_bytes(&key, sizeof(key)); - -If you're not deriving your key from here, you're doing it wrong. - -Using the functions -=================== - -There are two variants of the function, one that takes a list of integers, and -one that takes a buffer:: - - u32 hsiphash(const void *data, size_t len, const hsiphash_key_t *key); - -And:: - - u32 hsiphash_1u32(u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); - u32 hsiphash_2u32(u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); - u32 hsiphash_3u32(u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); - u32 hsiphash_4u32(u32, u32, u32, u32, const hsiphash_key_t *key); - -If you pass the generic hsiphash function something of a constant length, it -will constant fold at compile-time and automatically choose one of the -optimized functions. - -Hashtable key function usage -============================ - -:: - - struct some_hashtable { - DECLARE_HASHTABLE(hashtable, 8); - hsiphash_key_t key; - }; - - void init_hashtable(struct some_hashtable *table) - { - get_random_bytes(&table->key, sizeof(table->key)); - } - - static inline hlist_head *some_hashtable_bucket(struct some_hashtable *table, struct interesting_input *input) - { - return &table->hashtable[hsiphash(input, sizeof(*input), &table->key) & (HASH_SIZE(table->hashtable) - 1)]; - } - -You may then iterate like usual over the returned hash bucket. - -Performance -=========== - -HalfSipHash is roughly 3 times slower than JenkinsHash. For many replacements, -this will not be a problem, as the hashtable lookup isn't the bottleneck. And -in general, this is probably a good sacrifice to make for the security and DoS -resistance of HalfSipHash. -- cgit v1.2.3