From a16729ea822806a6f87415bcb523eaeb7f4b4ebd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:40:55 +0200 Subject: ARM: ux500: consolidate base platform files The cpu.c and cache-l2x0.c files hold only two or three simple functions each, and they are all called from the machine descriptors, so we can just move them all into the same file for simplicity and consistency. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c index c9c9832f79e9..46b1da1bf5d2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c @@ -12,22 +12,109 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include +#include +#include +#include +#include #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include +#include +#include #include +#include #include "setup.h" #include "board-mop500.h" #include "db8500-regs.h" +static int __init ux500_l2x0_unlock(void) +{ + int i; + struct device_node *np; + void __iomem *l2x0_base; + + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "arm,pl310-cache"); + l2x0_base = of_iomap(np, 0); + of_node_put(np); + if (!l2x0_base) + return -ENODEV; + + /* + * Unlock Data and Instruction Lock if locked. Ux500 U-Boot versions + * apparently locks both caches before jumping to the kernel. The + * l2x0 core will not touch the unlock registers if the l2x0 is + * already enabled, so we do it right here instead. The PL310 has + * 8 sets of registers, one per possible CPU. + */ + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { + writel_relaxed(0x0, l2x0_base + L2X0_LOCKDOWN_WAY_D_BASE + + i * L2X0_LOCKDOWN_STRIDE); + writel_relaxed(0x0, l2x0_base + L2X0_LOCKDOWN_WAY_I_BASE + + i * L2X0_LOCKDOWN_STRIDE); + } + iounmap(l2x0_base); + return 0; +} + +static void ux500_l2c310_write_sec(unsigned long val, unsigned reg) +{ + /* + * We can't write to secure registers as we are in non-secure + * mode, until we have some SMI service available. + */ +} + +/* + * FIXME: Should we set up the GPIO domain here? + * + * The problem is that we cannot put the interrupt resources into the platform + * device until the irqdomain has been added. Right now, we set the GIC interrupt + * domain from init_irq(), then load the gpio driver from + * core_initcall(nmk_gpio_init) and add the platform devices from + * arch_initcall(customize_machine). + * + * This feels fragile because it depends on the gpio device getting probed + * _before_ any device uses the gpio interrupts. +*/ +static void __init ux500_init_irq(void) +{ + struct device_node *np; + struct resource r; + + irqchip_init(); + np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "stericsson,db8500-prcmu"); + of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &r); + of_node_put(np); + if (!r.start) { + pr_err("could not find PRCMU base resource\n"); + return; + } + prcmu_early_init(r.start, r.end-r.start); + ux500_pm_init(r.start, r.end-r.start); + + /* Unlock before init */ + ux500_l2x0_unlock(); + outer_cache.write_sec = ux500_l2c310_write_sec; +} + +static void ux500_restart(enum reboot_mode mode, const char *cmd) +{ + local_irq_disable(); + local_fiq_disable(); + + prcmu_system_reset(0); +} + /* * The PMU IRQ lines of two cores are wired together into a single interrupt. * Bounce the interrupt to the other core if it's not ours. -- cgit v1.2.3