From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/blackfin/kernel/time-ts.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/blackfin/kernel') diff --git a/arch/blackfin/kernel/time-ts.c b/arch/blackfin/kernel/time-ts.c index fb9e95f1b719..0e9fcf841d67 100644 --- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/time-ts.c +++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/time-ts.c @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ #if defined(CONFIG_CYCLES_CLOCKSOURCE) -static notrace cycle_t bfin_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) +static notrace u64 bfin_read_cycles(struct clocksource *cs) { #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ return __bfin_cycles_off + (get_cycles() << __bfin_cycles_mod); @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void __init setup_gptimer0(void) enable_gptimers(TIMER0bit); } -static cycle_t bfin_read_gptimer0(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 bfin_read_gptimer0(struct clocksource *cs) { return bfin_read_TIMER0_COUNTER(); } -- cgit v1.2.3