From 9cb1ccecb69d133e014b7be4de2609f689398c07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heiko Carstens Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 13:12:19 +0100 Subject: s390: remove all usages of PSW_ADDR_INSN Yet another leftover from the 31 bit era. The usual operation "y = x & PSW_ADDR_INSN" with the PSW_ADDR_INSN mask is a nop for CONFIG_64BIT. Therefore remove all usages and hope the code is a bit less confusing. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand --- arch/s390/mm/fault.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/s390/mm') diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c index 95ed8d48f54e..791a4146052c 100644 --- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c +++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static inline void report_user_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long signr) return; printk(KERN_ALERT "User process fault: interruption code %04x ilc:%d ", regs->int_code & 0xffff, regs->int_code >> 17); - print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT "in ", regs->psw.addr & PSW_ADDR_INSN); + print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT "in ", regs->psw.addr); printk(KERN_CONT "\n"); printk(KERN_ALERT "failing address: %016lx TEID: %016lx\n", regs->int_parm_long & __FAIL_ADDR_MASK, regs->int_parm_long); @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static noinline void do_no_context(struct pt_regs *regs) const struct exception_table_entry *fixup; /* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */ - fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->psw.addr & PSW_ADDR_INSN); + fixup = search_exception_tables(regs->psw.addr); if (fixup) { regs->psw.addr = extable_fixup(fixup); return; -- cgit v1.2.3