From 90cc7d944981a6d06b49bb26fde1b490e28c90e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Cliff Wickman Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 16:22:02 -0500 Subject: x86, UV: Remove BAU check for stay-busy Remove a faulty assumption that a long running BAU request has encountered a hardware problem and will never finish. Numalink congestion can make a request appear to have encountered such a problem, but it is not safe to cancel the request. If such a cancel is done but a reply is later received we can miss a TLB shootdown. We depend upon the max_bau_concurrent 'throttle' to prevent the stay-busy case from happening. Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman Cc: gregkh@suse.de LKML-Reference: Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/include/asm/uv') diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h index 1c8f1e9bf74f..c19b870ea58a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uv/uv_bau.h @@ -402,7 +402,6 @@ struct bau_control { unsigned short uvhub_quiesce; short socket_acknowledge_count[DEST_Q_SIZE]; cycles_t send_message; - spinlock_t masks_lock; spinlock_t uvhub_lock; spinlock_t queue_lock; /* tunables */ -- cgit v1.2.3