From 237ede16ba5bcd4d6c612ea280518c48ca31986c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 00:24:27 +0530 Subject: cpufreq: powernow-k6: Fix incorrect comparison with max_multipler The value of 'max_multiplier' is meant to be used for comparison with clock_ratio[index].driver_data, not the index itself! Fix the code in powernow_k6_cpu_exit() that has this bug. Also, while at it, make the for-loop condition look for CPUFREQ_TABLE_END, instead of hard-coding the loop count to 8. Reported-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c index 49f120e1bc7b..695a68cfdcd4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernow-k6.c @@ -227,8 +227,9 @@ have_busfreq: static int powernow_k6_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { unsigned int i; - for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { - if (i == max_multiplier) + + for (i = 0; (clock_ratio[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END); i++) { + if (clock_ratio[i].driver_data == max_multiplier) powernow_k6_target(policy, i); } return 0; -- cgit v1.2.3