From 323ee8fc544d407eb053471b9607f95f987f5f12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 20:02:09 -0400 Subject: hfsplus: switch to ->iterate_shared() We need to protect the list of hfsplus_readdir_data against parallel insertions (in readdir) and removals (in release). Add a spinlock for that. Note that it has nothing to do with protection of hfsplus_readdir_data->key - we have an exclusion between hfsplus_readdir() and hfsplus_delete_cat() on directory lock and between several hfsplus_readdir() for the same struct file on ->f_pos_lock. The spinlock is strictly for list changes. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/hfsplus/catalog.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'fs/hfsplus/catalog.c') diff --git a/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c b/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c index 022974ab6e3c..fb707e8f423a 100644 --- a/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c +++ b/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c @@ -374,12 +374,15 @@ int hfsplus_delete_cat(u32 cnid, struct inode *dir, struct qstr *str) hfsplus_free_fork(sb, cnid, &fork, HFSPLUS_TYPE_RSRC); } + /* we only need to take spinlock for exclusion with ->release() */ + spin_lock(&HFSPLUS_I(dir)->open_dir_lock); list_for_each(pos, &HFSPLUS_I(dir)->open_dir_list) { struct hfsplus_readdir_data *rd = list_entry(pos, struct hfsplus_readdir_data, list); if (fd.tree->keycmp(fd.search_key, (void *)&rd->key) < 0) rd->file->f_pos--; } + spin_unlock(&HFSPLUS_I(dir)->open_dir_lock); err = hfs_brec_remove(&fd); if (err) -- cgit v1.2.3