From 7dd08a570dcf45d52155996fee688405635ee481 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:02:22 +0300 Subject: nfs: fix unlikely memory leak I'll admit that it's unlikely for the first allocation to fail and the second one to succeed. I won't be offended if you ignore this patch. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'fs/nfs') diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index eda74c42d552..f9254fb0c9d0 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5107,6 +5107,7 @@ static int nfs41_proc_async_sequence(struct nfs_client *clp, res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL); if (!args || !res) { kfree(args); + kfree(res); nfs_put_client(clp); return -ENOMEM; } -- cgit v1.2.3