From 981035b47d7da8ba7c153ed431bf515f593853d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yingtai Xie Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:03:54 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: correctly check the return value of ocfs2_search_extent_list ocfs2_search_extent_list may return -1, so we should check the return value in ocfs2_split_and_insert, otherwise it may cause array index out of bound. And ocfs2_search_extent_list can only return value less than el->l_next_free_rec, so check if it is equal or larger than le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) is meaningless. Signed-off-by: Yingtai Xie Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Mark Fasheh Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c') diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c index 599eb4c4c8be..6219aaadeb08 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/move_extents.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static int __ocfs2_move_extent(handle_t *handle, el = path_leaf_el(path); index = ocfs2_search_extent_list(el, cpos); - if (index == -1 || index >= le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec)) { + if (index == -1) { ocfs2_error(inode->i_sb, "Inode %llu has an extent at cpos %u which can no " "longer be found.\n", -- cgit v1.2.3