From 5443a0be6121d557e12951537e10159e4c61035d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 17:01:06 +0100 Subject: sched: Use fair:prio_changed() instead of ad-hoc implementation set_user_nice() implements its own version of fair::prio_changed() and therefore misses a specific optimization towards nohz_full CPUs that avoid sending an resched IPI to a reniced task running alone. Use the proper callback instead. Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191203160106.18806-3-frederic@kernel.org --- kernel/sched/core.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched') diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 90e4b00ace89..15508c202bf5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4540,17 +4540,17 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice) p->prio = effective_prio(p); delta = p->prio - old_prio; - if (queued) { + if (queued) enqueue_task(rq, p, ENQUEUE_RESTORE | ENQUEUE_NOCLOCK); - /* - * If the task increased its priority or is running and - * lowered its priority, then reschedule its CPU: - */ - if (delta < 0 || (delta > 0 && task_running(rq, p))) - resched_curr(rq); - } if (running) set_next_task(rq, p); + + /* + * If the task increased its priority or is running and + * lowered its priority, then reschedule its CPU: + */ + p->sched_class->prio_changed(rq, p, old_prio); + out_unlock: task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf); } -- cgit v1.2.3