From f7f9c00dfafffd7a5a1a5685e2d874c64913e2ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Baolin Wang Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:39:35 +0800 Subject: mm: change to return bool for isolate_lru_page() The isolate_lru_page() can only return 0 or -EBUSY, and most users did not care about the negative error of isolate_lru_page(), except one user in add_page_for_migration(). So we can convert the isolate_lru_page() to return a boolean value, which can help to make the code more clear when checking the return value of isolate_lru_page(). Also convert all users' logic of checking the isolation state. No functional changes intended. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/3074c1ab628d9dbf139b33f248a8bc253a3f95f0.1676424378.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Acked-by: Linus Torvalds Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/folio-compat.c | 12 +++--------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm/folio-compat.c') diff --git a/mm/folio-compat.c b/mm/folio-compat.c index 540373cf904e..cabcd1de9ecb 100644 --- a/mm/folio-compat.c +++ b/mm/folio-compat.c @@ -113,17 +113,11 @@ struct page *grab_cache_page_write_begin(struct address_space *mapping, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(grab_cache_page_write_begin); -int isolate_lru_page(struct page *page) +bool isolate_lru_page(struct page *page) { - bool ret; - if (WARN_RATELIMIT(PageTail(page), "trying to isolate tail page")) - return -EBUSY; - ret = folio_isolate_lru((struct folio *)page); - if (ret) - return 0; - - return -EBUSY; + return false; + return folio_isolate_lru((struct folio *)page); } void putback_lru_page(struct page *page) -- cgit v1.2.3