From 5a9e34747c9f731bbb6b7fd7521c4fec0d840593 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Vishal Moola (Oracle)" Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:08:48 -0800 Subject: mm/swap: convert deactivate_page() to folio_deactivate() Deactivate_page() has already been converted to use folios, this change converts it to take in a folio argument instead of calling page_folio(). It also renames the function folio_deactivate() to be more consistent with other folio functions. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix left-over comments, per Yu Zhao] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221221180848.20774-5-vishal.moola@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) Reviewed-by: SeongJae Park Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/page-writeback.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'mm/page-writeback.c') diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c index ad608ef2a243..41128ea9c997 100644 --- a/mm/page-writeback.c +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c @@ -2846,11 +2846,11 @@ bool folio_mark_dirty(struct folio *folio) if (likely(mapping)) { /* - * readahead/lru_deactivate_page could remain + * readahead/folio_deactivate could remain * PG_readahead/PG_reclaim due to race with folio_end_writeback * About readahead, if the folio is written, the flags would be * reset. So no problem. - * About lru_deactivate_page, if the folio is redirtied, + * About folio_deactivate, if the folio is redirtied, * the flag will be reset. So no problem. but if the * folio is used by readahead it will confuse readahead * and make it restart the size rampup process. But it's -- cgit v1.2.3