From a7d6e36b9ad052926ba2ecba3a59d8bb67dabcb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 17:36:33 +0800 Subject: ax25: Use kernel universal linked list to implement ax25_dev_list The origin ax25_dev_list implements its own single linked list, which is complicated and error-prone. For example, when deleting the node of ax25_dev_list in ax25_dev_device_down(), we have to operate on the head node and other nodes separately. This patch uses kernel universal linked list to replace original ax25_dev_list, which make the operation of ax25_dev_list easier. We should do "dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev;" and "dev->ax25_ptr = NULL;" while holding the spinlock, otherwise the ax25_dev_device_up() and ax25_dev_device_down() could race. Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/85bba3af651ca0e1a519da8d0d715b949891171c.1715247018.git.duoming@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- net/ax25/ax25_dev.c | 40 +++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) (limited to 'net') diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c index 282ec581c072..f16ee5c09d07 100644 --- a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c +++ b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c @@ -22,11 +22,12 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include -ax25_dev *ax25_dev_list; +static LIST_HEAD(ax25_dev_list); DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ax25_dev_lock); ax25_dev *ax25_addr_ax25dev(ax25_address *addr) @@ -34,7 +35,7 @@ ax25_dev *ax25_addr_ax25dev(ax25_address *addr) ax25_dev *ax25_dev, *res = NULL; spin_lock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); - for (ax25_dev = ax25_dev_list; ax25_dev != NULL; ax25_dev = ax25_dev->next) + list_for_each_entry(ax25_dev, &ax25_dev_list, list) if (ax25cmp(addr, (const ax25_address *)ax25_dev->dev->dev_addr) == 0) { res = ax25_dev; ax25_dev_hold(ax25_dev); @@ -59,7 +60,6 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_device *dev) } refcount_set(&ax25_dev->refcount, 1); - dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev; ax25_dev->dev = dev; netdev_hold(dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); ax25_dev->forward = NULL; @@ -85,8 +85,8 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_device *dev) #endif spin_lock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); - ax25_dev->next = ax25_dev_list; - ax25_dev_list = ax25_dev; + list_add(&ax25_dev->list, &ax25_dev_list); + dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev; spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); ax25_dev_hold(ax25_dev); @@ -111,32 +111,25 @@ void ax25_dev_device_down(struct net_device *dev) /* * Remove any packet forwarding that points to this device. */ - for (s = ax25_dev_list; s != NULL; s = s->next) + list_for_each_entry(s, &ax25_dev_list, list) if (s->forward == dev) s->forward = NULL; - if ((s = ax25_dev_list) == ax25_dev) { - ax25_dev_list = s->next; - goto unlock_put; - } - - while (s != NULL && s->next != NULL) { - if (s->next == ax25_dev) { - s->next = ax25_dev->next; + list_for_each_entry(s, &ax25_dev_list, list) { + if (s == ax25_dev) { + list_del(&s->list); goto unlock_put; } - - s = s->next; } - spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); dev->ax25_ptr = NULL; + spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev); return; unlock_put: + dev->ax25_ptr = NULL; spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev); - dev->ax25_ptr = NULL; netdev_put(dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker); ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev); } @@ -200,16 +193,13 @@ struct net_device *ax25_fwd_dev(struct net_device *dev) */ void __exit ax25_dev_free(void) { - ax25_dev *s, *ax25_dev; + ax25_dev *s, *n; spin_lock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); - ax25_dev = ax25_dev_list; - while (ax25_dev != NULL) { - s = ax25_dev; - netdev_put(ax25_dev->dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker); - ax25_dev = ax25_dev->next; + list_for_each_entry_safe(s, n, &ax25_dev_list, list) { + netdev_put(s->dev, &s->dev_tracker); + list_del(&s->list); kfree(s); } - ax25_dev_list = NULL; spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_dev_lock); } -- cgit v1.2.3