blob: 07937b49cb881c2d2795a16e025da4081ae3921d (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* Based on arch/arm/mm/mmap.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
*/
#include <linux/elf.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/mman.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/shm.h>
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/personality.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
/*
* You really shouldn't be using read() or write() on /dev/mem. This might go
* away in the future.
*/
int valid_phys_addr_range(phys_addr_t addr, size_t size)
{
/*
* Check whether addr is covered by a memory region without the
* MEMBLOCK_NOMAP attribute, and whether that region covers the
* entire range. In theory, this could lead to false negatives
* if the range is covered by distinct but adjacent memory regions
* that only differ in other attributes. However, few of such
* attributes have been defined, and it is debatable whether it
* follows that /dev/mem read() calls should be able traverse
* such boundaries.
*/
return memblock_is_region_memory(addr, size) &&
memblock_is_map_memory(addr);
}
/*
* Do not allow /dev/mem mappings beyond the supported physical range.
*/
int valid_mmap_phys_addr_range(unsigned long pfn, size_t size)
{
return !(((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) + size) & ~PHYS_MASK);
}
|
