summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/crypto/bn/bn_nist.c (follow)
Commit message (Expand)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Fix "possible loss of data" Win64 compiler warnings.Andy Polyakov2008-12-291-31/+31
* Revert the size_t modifications from HEAD that had led to moreGeoff Thorpe2008-11-121-3/+2
* size_tification.Ben Laurie2008-11-011-2/+3
* Fix argument order in BN_nnmod call and implement rigorous boundaryAndy Polyakov2008-10-161-10/+99
* Remove redundant BN_ucmp, fix boundary condition in BN_nist_mod_224 andAndy Polyakov2008-10-151-75/+44
* Fix build warnings.Geoff Thorpe2008-09-151-1/+0
* Some precautions to avoid potential security-relevant problems.Bodo Möller2008-09-141-49/+134
* Add 64-bit support to BN_nist_mod_244 and engage BN_nist_mod_* on 64-bitAndy Polyakov2008-04-241-6/+20
* Takanori Yanagisawa has shown how to correctly use pre-computed values.Andy Polyakov2008-04-231-231/+219
* Resolve __DECC warning and keep disclaiming support for 16-bit platforms.Andy Polyakov2008-04-181-69/+3
* Fix remaining BN_nist_mod_*.Andy Polyakov2008-04-181-106/+121
* Clarifying comment.Andy Polyakov2008-04-091-1/+9
* Do BN_nist_mod_384 by the book, as cheating doesn't work. Other functionsAndy Polyakov2008-04-091-59/+63
* Fix fast reduction on NIST curves (as well BN_NIST_ADD_ONE macro).Andy Polyakov2008-04-011-96/+52
* Brought forward from 0.9.8 - 64 bit warning fixes and fussy compiler fixes.Ben Laurie2005-06-291-0/+6
* TypoRichard Levitte2005-05-291-2/+2
* DEC C complains about bad subscript, but we know better, so let's shut it up.Richard Levitte2005-05-241-0/+9
* rewrite of bn_nist.c, disable support for some curves on 64 bit platformsNils Larsch2005-05-031-321/+231
* Convert openssl code not to assume the deprecated form of BN_zero().Geoff Thorpe2004-03-141-4/+16
* Minimise the amount of code dependent on BN_DEBUG_RAND. In particular,Geoff Thorpe2004-03-091-17/+0
* Even though C specification explicitly says that constant type "stretches"Andy Polyakov2004-01-251-13/+19
* This is a revert of my previous commit to "improve" the declaration ofGeoff Thorpe2003-11-051-16/+15
* typo in commentUlf Möller2003-11-051-1/+1
* Put the first stage of my bignum debugging adventures into CVS. This codeGeoff Thorpe2003-11-041-10/+15
* This is the least unacceptable way I've found for declaring the bignum dataGeoff Thorpe2003-11-041-15/+16
* Some provisional bignum debugging has begun to detect inconsistent BIGNUMGeoff Thorpe2003-10-291-1/+2
* clean up new code for NIST primesBodo Möller2002-10-281-13/+28
* fast reduction for NIST curvesBodo Möller2002-10-281-0/+828