| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This is just a slight markup improvement; there should be no difference
in rendering.
|
| |
|
|
| |
These were mistakenly removed in 00f95506e2523a9c120d9c38cc78d15bb56b8ec7
|
| |
|
|
| |
Use a more compact form like 'a, b, and c were added in version x'
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Same as the sd_pid_* counterparts, but take a pid file descriptor instead of
a pid, so that the callers can be sure that the returned values are really
about the process they asked for, and not about a recycled PID.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Something *is* similar
Something *works* similarly
Something does something, similarly to how something else does something
See https://sites.ulethbridge.ca/roussel/2017/11/29/similar-and-similarly-are-they-similar/
for a clear explanation.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fixes #16363. Also includes some changes where I generalized the pattern.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Logically, this is better, because we're describing a subset of possible
return values. Visually this also looks quite good because groff renders
refsect2 much less prominently.
Also rewrap things, add <constant> in various places, fix some typos.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "include" files had type "book" for some raeason. I don't think this
is meaningful. Let's just use the same everywhere.
$ perl -i -0pe 's^..DOCTYPE (book|refentry) PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.[25]//EN"\s+"http^<!DOCTYPE refentry PUBLIC "-//OASIS//DTD DocBook XML V4.5//EN"\n "http^gms' man/*.xml
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
No need to waste space, and uniformity is good.
$ perl -i -0pe 's|\n+<!--\s*SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1..\s*-->|\n<!-- SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+ -->|gms' man/*.xml
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This is already included in .dir-locals, so we don't need it
in the files themselves.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Docbook styles required those to be present, even though the templates that we
use did not show those names anywhere. But something changed semi-recently (I
would suspect docbook templates, but there was only a minor version bump in
recent years, and the changelog does not suggest anything related), and builds
now work without those entries. Let's drop this dead weight.
Tested with F26-F29, debian unstable.
$ perl -i -0pe 's/\s*<authorgroup>.*<.authorgroup>//gms' man/*xml
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These lines are generally out-of-date, incomplete and unnecessary. With
SPDX and git repository much more accurate and fine grained information
about licensing and authorship is available, hence let's drop the
per-file copyright notice. Of course, removing copyright lines of others
is problematic, hence this commit only removes my own lines and leaves
all others untouched. It might be nicer if sooner or later those could
go away too, making git the only and accurate source of authorship
information.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This part of the copyright blurb stems from the GPL use recommendations:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html
The concept appears to originate in times where version control was per
file, instead of per tree, and was a way to glue the files together.
Ultimately, we nowadays don't live in that world anymore, and this
information is entirely useless anyway, as people are very welcome to
copy these files into any projects they like, and they shouldn't have to
change bits that are part of our copyright header for that.
hence, let's just get rid of this old cruft, and shorten our codebase a
bit.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only difference is that functions are not individually listed by name,
but that seems completely pointless, since all functions that are documented
are always exported, so the generic text tells the user all she or he needs
to know.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Files which are installed as-is (any .service and other unit files, .conf
files, .policy files, etc), are left as is. My assumption is that SPDX
identifiers are not yet that well known, so it's better to retain the
extended header to avoid any doubt.
I also kept any copyright lines. We can probably remove them, but it'd nice to
obtain explicit acks from all involved authors before doing that.
|
| | |
|
|
|
Explanation:
"Please note the login session may be limited to a stub
process or two. User processes may instead be started from their
systemd user manager, e.g. GUI applications started using DBus
activation, as well as service processes which are shared between
multiple logins of the same user."
The most glaring example being when you run commands from gnome-terminal,
or as you see nowadays, "gnome-terminal-server".
*_get_session() is still currently used (directly or indirectly) by Xorg,
Weston etc. running within the session scope. That setup is perfectly
functional, although code will be more generally useful if it is able to
run outside the session scope.[1]
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd/User#Xorg_as_a_systemd_user_service
Re-order the man pages a bit at the same time. This is to avoid having the
first and titular entry introduce the session concept, and then immediately
try and persuade you not to use it :).
|
