summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/boot/bless-boot.c (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* bless-boot: pass the right error variableDavid Tardon2024-05-071-1/+1
|
* tree-wise: several cleanups for loggingYu Watanabe2024-04-301-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | - drop unnecessary SYNTHETIC_ERRNO() when the logger does not propagate error code, - drop unnecessary '%m' in error message when the error code is specified with SYNTHETIC_ERRNO(), - add missing full stop at the end of log message, - use RET_GATHER(), - add missing ", ignoring.", - upeercase the first letter, etc., etc...
* tree-wide: Use log_setup() everywhereDaan De Meyer2024-04-251-2/+1
| | | | | Otherwise the default log target is the console and we won't use the journal socket even if it is available.
* path-util: introduce skip_leading_slash and use it where appropriateMike Yuan2024-03-141-14/+7
|
* bless-boot: Actually return successfullyJan Janssen2023-08-021-0/+1
| | | | | | | | $ journalctl -u systemd-bless-boot.service systemd[1]: Starting Mark the Current Boot Loader Entry as Good... systemd-bless-boot[536]: Marked boot as 'good'. (Boot attempt counter is at 2.) systemd-bless-boot[536]: Can't find boot counter source file for '/loader/entries/arch.conf': Device or resource busy systemd[1]: Finished Mark the Current Boot Loader Entry as Good.
* tree-wide: use -EBADF for fd initializationZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2022-12-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | -1 was used everywhere, but -EBADF or -EBADFD started being used in various places. Let's make things consistent in the new style. Note that there are two candidates: EBADF 9 Bad file descriptor EBADFD 77 File descriptor in bad state Since we're initializating the fd, we're just assigning a value that means "no fd yet", so it's just a bad file descriptor, and the first errno fits better. If instead we had a valid file descriptor that became invalid because of some operation or state change, the other errno would fit better. In some places, initialization is dropped if unnecessary.
* basic: move version() to build.h+cZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2022-11-081-1/+1
|
* bless-boot: remove a bunch of 'else'Lennart Poettering2022-08-231-2/+2
|
* tree-wide: port things dirname_malloc() → path_extract_directory()Lennart Poettering2022-08-231-9/+5
|
* bootctl: add --root and --imageLuca Boccassi2022-07-081-2/+2
| | | | Operate on image/directory, and also take files to install from it
* basic: split out dev_t related calls into new devno-util.[ch]Lennart Poettering2022-04-131-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | No actual code changes, just splitting out of some dev_t handling related calls from stat-util.[ch], they are quite a number already, and deserve their own module now I think. Also, try to settle on the name "devnum" as the name for the concept, instead of "devno" or "dev" or "devid". "devnum" is the name exported in udev APIs, hence probably best to stick to that. (this just renames a few symbols to "devum", local variables are left untouched, to make the patch not too invasive) No actual code changes.
* efi-loader: split efi-api.[ch] from efi-loader.[ch]Lennart Poettering2022-03-241-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some refactoring: split efi-loader.[ch] in two: isolate the calls that implement out boot loader interface spec, and those which implement access to upstream UEFI firmware features. They are quite different in nature and behaviour, and even semantically it makes to keep these two separate. At the very least because the previous name "efi-loader.[ch]" suggests all was about loader-specific APIs, but much of it is generic uefi stuff... While we are at it, I renamed a bunch of return parameters to follow our usual ret_xyz naming. But besides renaming no real code changes.
* strv: make iterator in STRV_FOREACH() declaread in the loopYu Watanabe2022-03-191-2/+0
| | | | This also avoids multiple evaluations in STRV_FOREACH_BACKWARDS()
* shared: split out ESP/XBOOTLDR search stuff from bootspec.cLennart Poettering2022-03-181-0/+1
| | | | | | | | The code is quite different from the rest of bootspec.c, with different deps and stuff. There's even a /***/ line to separate the two parts. Given how large the file already is, let#s just split it into two. No code changes, just some splitting out.
* boot: suppress XBOOTLDR if same device as ESP when enumerating entriesLennart Poettering2022-02-141-4/+8
| | | | | | | | | | On my local system I linked up the ESP and XBOOTLDR partitions, and ended up with duplicate entries being listed. Try hard to detect that and only enumerate entries in the ESP if it turns out that both dirs have the same dev_t. This should detect both bind mounted and symlinked cases and should make our list output less confusing.
* alloc-util: add strdupa_safe() + strndupa_safe() and use it everywhereLennart Poettering2021-10-141-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Let's define two helpers strdupa_safe() + strndupa_safe() which do the same as their non-safe counterparts, except that they abort if called with allocations larger than ALLOCA_MAX. This should ensure that all our alloca() based allocations are subject to this limit. afaics glibc offers three alloca() based APIs: alloca() itself, strndupa() + strdupa(). With this we have now replacements for all of them, that take the limit into account.
* basic: split out sync() family of calls from fs-util.[ch] into new c/h fileLennart Poettering2021-10-051-0/+1
| | | | No changes in code, just some splitting out.
* Drop the text argument from assert_not_reached()Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2021-08-031-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In general we almost never hit those asserts in production code, so users see them very rarely, if ever. But either way, we just need something that users can pass to the developers. We have quite a few of those asserts, and some have fairly nice messages, but many are like "WTF?" or "???" or "unexpected something". The error that is printed includes the file location, and function name. In almost all functions there's at most one assert, so the function name alone is enough to identify the failure for a developer. So we don't get much extra from the message, and we might just as well drop them. Dropping them makes our code a tiny bit smaller, and most importantly, improves development experience by making it easy to insert such an assert in the code without thinking how to phrase the argument.
* basic/efivars: replace dynanamic creation of efivar names with static stringsZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2021-06-151-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Creating those string dynamically at runtime is slow and unnecessary. Let's use static strings with a bit of macro magic and the let the compiler coalesce as much as possible. $ size build/src/shared/libsystemd-shared-248.so{.old,} text data bss dec hex filename 2813453 94572 4584 2912609 2c7161 build/src/shared/libsystemd-shared-248.so.old 2812309 94564 4584 2911457 2c6ce1 build/src/shared/libsystemd-shared-248.so A nice side-effect is that the same form is used everywhere, so it's easier to figure out all variables that are used, and where each specific variable is used. C.f. 2b0445262ad9be2a9bf49956ab8e886ea2e48a0a. Note: 'const char *foo = alloca(…);' seems OK. Our coding style document and alloca(3) only warn against using alloca() in function invocations. Declaring both stack variable and alloca at the same time should be fine: no matter in which order they happen, i.e. if the pointer variable is above the contents, or the contents are above the pointer, or even if the pointer is elided by the compiler, everything should be fine.
* tree-wide: avoid uninitialized warning on _cleanup_ variablesLuca Boccassi2021-04-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | With some versions of the compiler, the _cleanup_ attr makes it think the variable might be freed/closed when uninitialized, even though it cannot happen. The added cost is small enough to be worth the benefit, and optimized builds will help reduce it even further.
* tree-wide: Drop custom formatting for print() help messagesDaan De Meyer2021-01-311-6/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | I think this formatting was originally used because it simplified adding new options to the help messages. However, these days, most tools their help message end with "\nSee the %s for details.\n" so the final line almost never has to be edited which eliminates the benefit of the custom formatting used for printf() help messages. Let's make things more consistent and use the same formatting for printf() help messages that we use everywhere else. Prompted by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/18355#discussion_r567241580
* license: LGPL-2.1+ -> LGPL-2.1-or-laterYu Watanabe2020-11-091-1/+1
|
* bless-boot: add missing verb to --helpZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2020-08-051-0/+1
| | | | | There is also "help" verb which duplicates the --help option. I don't think we should advertise it.
* tree-wide: clean up --help texts a bitLennart Poettering2019-11-181-9/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This cleans up and unifies the outut of --help texts a bit: 1. Highlight the human friendly description string, not the command line via ANSI sequences. Previously both this description string and the brief command line summary was marked with the same ANSI highlight sequence, but given we auto-page to less and less does not honour multi-line highlights only the command line summary was affectively highlighted. Rationale: for highlighting the description instead of the command line: the command line summary is relatively boring, and mostly the same for out tools, the description on the other hand is pregnant, important and captions the whole thing and hence deserves highlighting. 2. Always suffix "Options" with ":" in the help text 3. Rename "Flags" → "Options" in one case 4. Move commands to the top in a few cases 5. add coloring to many more help pages 6. Unify on COMMAND instead of {COMMAND} in the command line summary. Some tools did it one way, others the other way. I am not sure what precisely {} is supposed to mean, that uppercasing doesn't, hence let's simplify and stick to the {}-less syntax And minor other tweaks.
* util-lib: split shared/efivars into basic/efivars and shared/efi-loaderZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2019-09-161-0/+1
| | | | | | I want to use efivars.[ch] in proc-cmdline.c, but most of the efivars stuff is not needed in basic/. Move the file from shared/ to basic/, but then move back most of the higher-level functions to the new shared/efi-loader.c file.
* bless-boot: drop must_be_root() checksZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2019-05-081-6/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If we lack permissions, we will fail anyway. But by not doing the artifial check, we get more information. For example, on my machine, I see $ build/systemd-bless-boot good Not booted with boot counting in effect. while "Need to be root" is actually untrue, because being root doesn't change the outcome in any way. Letting the operation fail on the actual error makes it easier to do test runs: we *know* the command will fail, but we want to see what the first step would be. Not doing the articial check makes it also easier to do create alternative security arrangements, for example where the directories are mounted with special ownership mode and an otherwise unprivileged user can perform certain operations.
* boot-bless: port over to new $BOOT discovery callsLennart Poettering2019-03-011-75/+116
|
* coccinelle: make use of SYNTHETIC_ERRNOZbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek2018-11-221-28/+26
| | | | | | | | | | | Ideally, coccinelle would strip unnecessary braces too. But I do not see any option in coccinelle for this, so instead, I edited the patch text using search&replace to remove the braces. Unfortunately this is not fully automatic, in particular it didn't deal well with if-else-if-else blocks and ifdefs, so there is an increased likelikehood be some bugs in such spots. I also removed part of the patch that coccinelle generated for udev, where we returns -1 for failure. This should be fixed independently.
* bless-boot: use static destructor and DEFINE_MAIN_FUNCTION() macroYu Watanabe2018-11-201-12/+9
|
* util-lib: move main() definition macros to its own header fileLennart Poettering2018-11-191-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | This way, we can extend the macro a bit with stuff pulled in from other headers without this affecting everything which pulls in macro.h, which is one of our most basic headers. This is just refactoring, no change in behaviour, in prepartion for later changes.
* add new systemd-bless-boot.service that marks boots as successfulLennart Poettering2018-10-191-0/+476
This is the counterpiece to the boot counting implemented in systemd-boot: if a boot is detected as successful we mark drop the counter again from the booted snippet or kernel image.