diff options
author | Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> | 2020-06-09 06:31:45 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-06-09 18:39:12 +0200 |
commit | 1ad87824f4cf16a7f381e1f94943a96bb7a99062 (patch) | |
tree | 3d5ced0ad64d549704fcbc2b7e3cb93edfec4518 | |
parent | um/sysrq: remove needless variable sp (diff) | |
download | linux-1ad87824f4cf16a7f381e1f94943a96bb7a99062.tar.xz linux-1ad87824f4cf16a7f381e1f94943a96bb7a99062.zip |
um: add show_stack_loglvl()
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform
realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with
lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or
user).
Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture
side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with
temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in
result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also
omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred.
Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier
approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate
printings with headers.
Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute
show_stack().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-37-dima@arista.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c index c831a1c2eb94..1b54b6431499 100644 --- a/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c +++ b/arch/um/kernel/sysrq.c @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ static void _print_addr(void *data, unsigned long address, int reliable) { - pr_info(" [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", address, reliable ? "" : "? ", + const char *loglvl = data; + + printk("%s [<%08lx>] %s%pS\n", loglvl, address, reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *)address); } @@ -25,7 +27,8 @@ static const struct stacktrace_ops stackops = { .address = _print_addr }; -void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) +void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack, + const char *loglvl) { struct pt_regs *segv_regs = current->thread.segv_regs; int i; @@ -39,17 +42,22 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) if (!stack) stack = get_stack_pointer(task, segv_regs); - pr_info("Stack:\n"); + printk("%sStack:\n", loglvl); for (i = 0; i < 3 * STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE; i++) { if (kstack_end(stack)) break; if (i && ((i % STACKSLOTS_PER_LINE) == 0)) - pr_cont("\n"); + printk("%s\n", loglvl); pr_cont(" %08lx", *stack++); } - pr_cont("\n"); + printk("%s\n", loglvl); + + printk("%sCall Trace:\n", loglvl); + dump_trace(current, &stackops, (void *)loglvl); + printk("%s\n", loglvl); +} - pr_info("Call Trace:\n"); - dump_trace(current, &stackops, NULL); - pr_info("\n"); +void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) +{ + show_stack_loglvl(task, stack, KERN_INFO); } |