diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-09-21 20:59:16 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-09-21 20:59:16 +0200 |
commit | a99855d1598be17d3da618234daab5cbc49afb07 (patch) | |
tree | 3a99f3b18a470af3cc600720f021bc6f20444b16 | |
parent | Merge branch 'net-setup_timer' (diff) | |
parent | samples/bpf: Add documentation on cross compilation (diff) | |
download | linux-a99855d1598be17d3da618234daab5cbc49afb07.tar.xz linux-a99855d1598be17d3da618234daab5cbc49afb07.zip |
Merge branch 'ebpf-samples-cross-compile'
Joel Fernandes says:
====================
Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples
These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64.
Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch and exploring
other options to fix it. However these patches are a step in the right
direction and I look forward to getting them into -next and the merge window.
Changes since v3:
- just a repost with acks
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/8/7/417
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r-- | samples/bpf/Makefile | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | samples/bpf/README.rst | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h | 56 |
5 files changed, 67 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile index cf17c7932a6e..ebc2ad69b62c 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile @@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ HOSTLOADLIBES_syscall_tp += -lelf LLC ?= llc CLANG ?= clang +# Detect that we're cross compiling and use the cross compiler +ifdef CROSS_COMPILE +HOSTCC = $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc +endif + # Trick to allow make to be run from this directory all: $(MAKE) -C ../../ $(CURDIR)/ @@ -225,7 +230,7 @@ $(obj)/%.o: $(src)/%.c $(CLANG) $(NOSTDINC_FLAGS) $(LINUXINCLUDE) $(EXTRA_CFLAGS) -I$(obj) \ -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ \ -D__KERNEL__ -D__ASM_SYSREG_H -Wno-unused-value -Wno-pointer-sign \ - -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types \ + -D__TARGET_ARCH_$(ARCH) -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types \ -Wno-gnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end \ -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wno-tautological-compare \ -Wno-unknown-warning-option \ diff --git a/samples/bpf/README.rst b/samples/bpf/README.rst index 79f9a58f1872..5f27e4faca50 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/README.rst +++ b/samples/bpf/README.rst @@ -64,3 +64,13 @@ It is also possible to point make to the newly compiled 'llc' or 'clang' command via redefining LLC or CLANG on the make command line:: make samples/bpf/ LLC=~/git/llvm/build/bin/llc CLANG=~/git/llvm/build/bin/clang + +Cross compiling samples +----------------------- +In order to cross-compile, say for arm64 targets, export CROSS_COMPILE and ARCH +environment variables before calling make. This will direct make to build +samples for the cross target. + +export ARCH=arm64 +export CROSS_COMPILE="aarch64-linux-gnu-" +make samples/bpf/ LLC=~/git/llvm/build/bin/llc CLANG=~/git/llvm/build/bin/clang diff --git a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c index 098c857f1eda..2b2ffb97018b 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c +++ b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_kern.c @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ int stress_hash_map_lookup(struct pt_regs *ctx) return 0; } -SEC("kprobe/sys_getpgrp") +SEC("kprobe/sys_getppid") int stress_array_map_lookup(struct pt_regs *ctx) { u32 key = 1, i; diff --git a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c index f388254896f6..a0310fc70057 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c +++ b/samples/bpf/map_perf_test_user.c @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static void test_array_lookup(int cpu) start_time = time_get_ns(); for (i = 0; i < max_cnt; i++) - syscall(__NR_getpgrp, 0); + syscall(__NR_getppid, 0); printf("%d:array_lookup %lld lookups per sec\n", cpu, max_cnt * 1000000000ll * 64 / (time_get_ns() - start_time)); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h index 36fb9161b34a..4875395b0b52 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_helpers.h @@ -109,7 +109,47 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_under_cgroup)(void *ctx, void *map, int index) = static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = (void *) BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head; +/* Scan the ARCH passed in from ARCH env variable (see Makefile) */ +#if defined(__TARGET_ARCH_x86) + #define bpf_target_x86 + #define bpf_target_defined +#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_s930x) + #define bpf_target_s930x + #define bpf_target_defined +#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_arm64) + #define bpf_target_arm64 + #define bpf_target_defined +#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_mips) + #define bpf_target_mips + #define bpf_target_defined +#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_powerpc) + #define bpf_target_powerpc + #define bpf_target_defined +#elif defined(__TARGET_ARCH_sparc) + #define bpf_target_sparc + #define bpf_target_defined +#else + #undef bpf_target_defined +#endif + +/* Fall back to what the compiler says */ +#ifndef bpf_target_defined #if defined(__x86_64__) + #define bpf_target_x86 +#elif defined(__s390x__) + #define bpf_target_s930x +#elif defined(__aarch64__) + #define bpf_target_arm64 +#elif defined(__mips__) + #define bpf_target_mips +#elif defined(__powerpc__) + #define bpf_target_powerpc +#elif defined(__sparc__) + #define bpf_target_sparc +#endif +#endif + +#if defined(bpf_target_x86) #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->di) #define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->si) @@ -122,7 +162,7 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = #define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->sp) #define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->ip) -#elif defined(__s390x__) +#elif defined(bpf_target_s390x) #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->gprs[2]) #define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->gprs[3]) @@ -135,7 +175,7 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = #define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->gprs[15]) #define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->psw.addr) -#elif defined(__aarch64__) +#elif defined(bpf_target_arm64) #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->regs[0]) #define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->regs[1]) @@ -148,7 +188,7 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = #define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->sp) #define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->pc) -#elif defined(__mips__) +#elif defined(bpf_target_mips) #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->regs[4]) #define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->regs[5]) @@ -161,7 +201,7 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = #define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->regs[29]) #define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->cp0_epc) -#elif defined(__powerpc__) +#elif defined(bpf_target_powerpc) #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->gpr[3]) #define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->gpr[4]) @@ -172,7 +212,7 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = #define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->sp) #define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->nip) -#elif defined(__sparc__) +#elif defined(bpf_target_sparc) #define PT_REGS_PARM1(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I0]) #define PT_REGS_PARM2(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I1]) @@ -182,6 +222,8 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = #define PT_REGS_RET(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I7]) #define PT_REGS_RC(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_I0]) #define PT_REGS_SP(x) ((x)->u_regs[UREG_FP]) + +/* Should this also be a bpf_target check for the sparc case? */ #if defined(__arch64__) #define PT_REGS_IP(x) ((x)->tpc) #else @@ -190,10 +232,10 @@ static int (*bpf_skb_change_head)(void *, int len, int flags) = #endif -#ifdef __powerpc__ +#ifdef bpf_target_powerpc #define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ (ip) = (ctx)->link; }) #define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP -#elif defined(__sparc__) +#elif bpf_target_sparc #define BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP(ip, ctx) ({ (ip) = PT_REGS_RET(ctx); }) #define BPF_KRETPROBE_READ_RET_IP BPF_KPROBE_READ_RET_IP #else |