diff options
author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2019-01-28 18:22:58 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2019-02-07 11:13:12 +0100 |
commit | badfa5be854d52956eb32aa3b8d29db3fd2b05a7 (patch) | |
tree | 5ca6215049c8a8bc8c1bc083ea3428f82663c4d4 | |
parent | drm/bridge: cdns: Convert to phy framework (diff) | |
download | linux-badfa5be854d52956eb32aa3b8d29db3fd2b05a7.tar.xz linux-badfa5be854d52956eb32aa3b8d29db3fd2b05a7.zip |
drm/doc: Make igts for cross-driver stuff strongly suggested
Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved
forward a lot:
- gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build
and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform
concerns raised in the RFC discussions).
- tests reorganized into subdirectories so that the i915-gem tests
don't clog the main/shared tests directory anymore
- quite a few more non-intel people contributing/reviewing/committing
igt tests patches.
I think this addresses all the concerns raised in the RFC discussions,
and assuming there's enough Acks and no new issues that pop up, we can
go ahead with this.
v2:
- Use "should" (in the usual RFC sense) to make it clear that in the
end this is all up to reviewer's discretion, as usual (Jani).
- Also in the title s/mandatory/strongly suggested/ (me)
- Make it clear we're not going to block features if a testcase is not
feasible, given hw and state of igt, both having some good gaps in
what can be tested (Harry, Eric, Sean, ...).
1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10648851/
Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Cc: "Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> (v1)
Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Acked-by: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Acked-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: "Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Brian Starkey <brian.starkey@arm.com>
Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128172258.9585-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 8 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst index a752aa561ea4..c9fd23efd957 100644 --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst @@ -238,6 +238,14 @@ DRM specific patterns. Note that ENOTTY has the slightly unintuitive meaning of Testing and validation ====================== +Testing Requirements for userspace API +-------------------------------------- + +New cross-driver userspace interface extensions, like new IOCTL, new KMS +properties, new files in sysfs or anything else that constitutes an API change +should have driver-agnostic testcases in IGT for that feature, if such a test +can be reasonably made using IGT for the target hardware. + Validating changes with IGT --------------------------- |