diff options
| author | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2017-10-03 20:25:27 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2017-10-10 11:50:18 +0200 |
| commit | a8a217c22116eff6c120d753c9934089fb229af0 (patch) | |
| tree | d56f1283ba7153f9ead9fb92c1a1794143c6e4a3 /arch/parisc | |
| parent | locking/rwsem, security/apparmor: Replace homebrew use of write_can_lock() wi... (diff) | |
| download | linux-a8a217c22116eff6c120d753c9934089fb229af0.tar.xz linux-a8a217c22116eff6c120d753c9934089fb229af0.zip | |
locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock()
Outside of the locking code itself, {read,spin,write}_can_lock() have no
users in tree. Apparmor (the last remaining user of write_can_lock()) got
moved over to lockdep by the previous patch.
This patch removes the use of {read,spin,write}_can_lock() from the
BUILD_LOCK_OPS macro, deferring to the trylock operation for testing the
lock status, and subsequently removes the unused macros altogether. They
aren't guaranteed to work in a concurrent environment and can give
incorrect results in the case of qrwlock.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/parisc')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h | 18 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h index 55bfe4affca3..136e1c9bb8a9 100644 --- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -168,24 +168,6 @@ static __inline__ int arch_write_trylock(arch_rwlock_t *rw) return result; } -/* - * read_can_lock - would read_trylock() succeed? - * @lock: the rwlock in question. - */ -static __inline__ int arch_read_can_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw) -{ - return rw->counter >= 0; -} - -/* - * write_can_lock - would write_trylock() succeed? - * @lock: the rwlock in question. - */ -static __inline__ int arch_write_can_lock(arch_rwlock_t *rw) -{ - return !rw->counter; -} - #define arch_read_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_read_lock(lock) #define arch_write_lock_flags(lock, flags) arch_write_lock(lock) |