diff options
author | Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> | 2022-10-25 20:45:16 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-10-26 08:11:46 +0200 |
commit | 271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476 (patch) | |
tree | 556578ff32ceed2a81bfc0333a041c5fd789ff5c /arch | |
parent | libbpf: Btf dedup identical struct test needs check for nested structs/arrays (diff) | |
download | linux-271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476.tar.xz linux-271de525e1d7f564e88a9d212c50998b49a54476.zip |
bpf: Remove prog->active check for bpf_lsm and bpf_iter
The commit 64696c40d03c ("bpf: Add __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}_struct_ops for struct_ops trampoline")
removed prog->active check for struct_ops prog. The bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter is also using trampoline. Like struct_ops, the bpf_lsm
and bpf_iter have fixed hooks for the prog to attach. The
kernel does not call the same hook in a recursive way.
This patch also removes the prog->active check for
bpf_lsm and bpf_iter.
A later patch has a test to reproduce the recursion issue
for a sleepable bpf_lsm program.
This patch appends the '_recur' naming to the existing
enter and exit functions that track the prog->active counter.
New __bpf_prog_{enter,exit}[_sleepable] function are
added to skip the prog->active tracking. The '_struct_ops'
version is also removed.
It also moves the decision on picking the enter and exit function to
the new bpf_trampoline_{enter,exit}(). It returns the '_recur' ones
for all tracing progs to use. For bpf_lsm, bpf_iter,
struct_ops (no prog->active tracking after 64696c40d03c), and
bpf_lsm_cgroup (no prog->active tracking after 69fd337a975c7),
it will return the functions that don't track the prog->active.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 19 |
2 files changed, 4 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 30f76178608b..62f805f427b7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1649,13 +1649,8 @@ static void invoke_bpf_prog(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_link *l, struct bpf_prog *p = l->link.prog; int cookie_off = offsetof(struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx, bpf_cookie); - if (p->aux->sleepable) { - enter_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable; - exit_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_exit_sleepable; - } else { - enter_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_enter; - exit_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_exit; - } + enter_prog = (u64)bpf_trampoline_enter(p); + exit_prog = (u64)bpf_trampoline_exit(p); if (l->cookie == 0) { /* if cookie is zero, one instruction is enough to store it */ diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index d7dd8e0db8da..36ffe67ad6e5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1894,10 +1894,6 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int stack_size, int run_ctx_off, bool save_ret) { - void (*exit)(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) = __bpf_prog_exit; - u64 (*enter)(struct bpf_prog *prog, - struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx *run_ctx) = __bpf_prog_enter; u8 *prog = *pprog; u8 *jmp_insn; int ctx_cookie_off = offsetof(struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx, bpf_cookie); @@ -1916,23 +1912,12 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, */ emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_1, -run_ctx_off + ctx_cookie_off); - if (p->aux->sleepable) { - enter = __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable; - exit = __bpf_prog_exit_sleepable; - } else if (p->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) { - enter = __bpf_prog_enter_struct_ops; - exit = __bpf_prog_exit_struct_ops; - } else if (p->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP) { - enter = __bpf_prog_enter_lsm_cgroup; - exit = __bpf_prog_exit_lsm_cgroup; - } - /* arg1: mov rdi, progs[i] */ emit_mov_imm64(&prog, BPF_REG_1, (long) p >> 32, (u32) (long) p); /* arg2: lea rsi, [rbp - ctx_cookie_off] */ EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x75, -run_ctx_off); - if (emit_call(&prog, enter, prog)) + if (emit_call(&prog, bpf_trampoline_enter(p), prog)) return -EINVAL; /* remember prog start time returned by __bpf_prog_enter */ emit_mov_reg(&prog, true, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0); @@ -1977,7 +1962,7 @@ static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, emit_mov_reg(&prog, true, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6); /* arg3: lea rdx, [rbp - run_ctx_off] */ EMIT4(0x48, 0x8D, 0x55, -run_ctx_off); - if (emit_call(&prog, exit, prog)) + if (emit_call(&prog, bpf_trampoline_exit(p), prog)) return -EINVAL; *pprog = prog; |