diff options
author | Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> | 2022-09-16 09:19:39 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2022-11-01 14:09:44 +0100 |
commit | 71f8ca77cb8764d46f656b725999e8b8b1aec215 (patch) | |
tree | 0382b29e3b2b8121239f00ca1b89d3a31a85127e /block/bfq-iosched.c | |
parent | block, bfq: record how many queues have pending requests (diff) | |
download | linux-71f8ca77cb8764d46f656b725999e8b8b1aec215.tar.xz linux-71f8ca77cb8764d46f656b725999e8b8b1aec215.zip |
block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'
Currently, bfq can't handle sync io concurrently as long as they
are not issued from root group. This is because
'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in
bfq_asymmetric_scenario().
The way that bfqg is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs':
Before this patch:
1) root group will never be counted.
2) Count if bfqg or it's child bfqgs have pending requests.
3) Don't count if bfqg and it's child bfqgs complete all the requests.
After this patch:
1) root group is counted.
2) Count if bfqg have pending requests.
3) Don't count if bfqg complete all the requests.
With this change, the occasion that only one group is activated can be
detected, and next patch will support concurrent sync io in the
occasion.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220916071942.214222-4-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block/bfq-iosched.c')
-rw-r--r-- | block/bfq-iosched.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 42 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 71fadc7ebe0d..d5febdb0a6c0 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -970,48 +970,6 @@ reset_entity_pointer: void bfq_weights_tree_remove(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq) { - struct bfq_entity *entity = bfqq->entity.parent; - - for_each_entity(entity) { - struct bfq_sched_data *sd = entity->my_sched_data; - - if (sd->next_in_service || sd->in_service_entity) { - /* - * entity is still active, because either - * next_in_service or in_service_entity is not - * NULL (see the comments on the definition of - * next_in_service for details on why - * in_service_entity must be checked too). - * - * As a consequence, its parent entities are - * active as well, and thus this loop must - * stop here. - */ - break; - } - - /* - * The decrement of num_groups_with_pending_reqs is - * not performed immediately upon the deactivation of - * entity, but it is delayed to when it also happens - * that the first leaf descendant bfqq of entity gets - * all its pending requests completed. The following - * instructions perform this delayed decrement, if - * needed. See the comments on - * num_groups_with_pending_reqs for details. - */ - if (entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs) { - entity->in_groups_with_pending_reqs = false; - bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs--; - } - } - - /* - * Next function is invoked last, because it causes bfqq to be - * freed if the following holds: bfqq is not in service and - * has no dispatched request. DO NOT use bfqq after the next - * function invocation. - */ __bfq_weights_tree_remove(bfqd, bfqq, &bfqd->queue_weights_tree); } |