diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2017-10-26 12:12:22 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2017-11-06 13:57:46 +0100 |
commit | c4b65157aeefad29b2351a00a010e8c40ce7fd0e (patch) | |
tree | b1b8d90e30729fc4d7d918d1df7d014ba6d448c8 /drivers/base | |
parent | PCI / PM: Drop unnecessary invocations of pcibios_pm_ops callbacks (diff) | |
download | linux-c4b65157aeefad29b2351a00a010e8c40ce7fd0e.tar.xz linux-c4b65157aeefad29b2351a00a010e8c40ce7fd0e.zip |
PCI / PM: Take SMART_SUSPEND driver flag into account
Make the PCI bus type take DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND into account in its
system-wide PM callbacks and make sure that all code that should not
run in parallel with pci_pm_runtime_resume() is executed in the "late"
phases of system suspend, freeze and poweroff transitions.
[Note that the pm_runtime_suspended() check in pci_dev_keep_suspended()
is an optimization, because if is not passed, all of the subsequent
checks may be skipped and some of them are much more overhead in
general.]
Also use the observation that if the device is in runtime suspend
at the beginning of the "late" phase of a system-wide suspend-like
transition, its state cannot change going forward (runtime PM is
disabled for it at that time) until the transition is over and the
subsequent system-wide PM callbacks should be skipped for it (as
they generally assume the device to not be suspended), so add checks
for that in pci_pm_suspend_late/noirq(), pci_pm_freeze_late/noirq()
and pci_pm_poweroff_late/noirq().
Moreover, if pci_pm_resume_noirq() or pci_pm_restore_noirq() is
called during the subsequent system-wide resume transition and if
the device was left in runtime suspend previously, its runtime PM
status needs to be changed to "active" as it is going to be put
into the full-power state, so add checks for that too to these
functions.
In turn, if pci_pm_thaw_noirq() runs after the device has been
left in runtime suspend, the subsequent "thaw" callbacks need
to be skipped for it (as they may not work correctly with a
suspended device), so set the power.direct_complete flag for the
device then to make the PM core skip those callbacks.
In addition to the above add a core helper for checking if
DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND is set and the device runtime PM status is
"suspended" at the same time, which is done quite often in the new
code (and will be done elsewhere going forward too).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/base/power/main.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c index 8d9024017645..6c6f1c74c24c 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c @@ -1861,3 +1861,9 @@ void device_pm_check_callbacks(struct device *dev) !dev->driver->suspend && !dev->driver->resume)); spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock); } + +bool dev_pm_smart_suspend_and_suspended(struct device *dev) +{ + return dev_pm_test_driver_flags(dev, DPM_FLAG_SMART_SUSPEND) && + pm_runtime_status_suspended(dev); +} |