clk: at91: remove unnecessary conditions

This code checks "if (parent_hw)" is non-NULL, but then it has more
checks if parent_hw is non-NULL on the lines inside the if statement.
It is a bit confusing.

For the else statement, keep in mind that at the start of the function
we checked:

	if (!(parent_name || parent_hw))
		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

That check ensures that if parent_hw is NULL that means that parent_name
is non-NULL.  At least one must always be non-NULL.  So here again, the
checks inside the if statement can be removed.

In the original code, it was a bit confusing and you could easily get
the impression that "init.num_parents" could be zero.  When we remove
the unnecessary checking it's more obvious that it's always set to 1.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7782b4f1-deed-49dc-8207-b6ea06d7602f@moroto.mountain
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-utmi.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-utmi.c
index 40c84f5af5e8..b991180beea1 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-utmi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-utmi.c
@@ -161,13 +161,11 @@ at91_clk_register_utmi_internal(struct regmap *regmap_pmc,
 
 	init.name = name;
 	init.ops = ops;
-	if (parent_hw) {
-		init.parent_hws = parent_hw ? (const struct clk_hw **)&parent_hw : NULL;
-		init.num_parents = parent_hw ? 1 : 0;
-	} else {
-		init.parent_names = parent_name ? &parent_name : NULL;
-		init.num_parents = parent_name ? 1 : 0;
-	}
+	if (parent_hw)
+		init.parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw **)&parent_hw;
+	else
+		init.parent_names = &parent_name;
+	init.num_parents = 1;
 	init.flags = flags;
 
 	utmi->hw.init = &init;