diff options
| author | Long Li <leo.lilong@huaweicloud.com> | 2023-06-13 17:49:20 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> | 2023-06-13 17:49:20 +0200 |
| commit | c3b880acadc95d6e019eae5d669e072afda24f1b (patch) | |
| tree | d40bc1819cbf38990048bb19c071fbdbf7b091b5 /fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | |
| parent | xfs: set FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT instead of a dummy direct_IO method (diff) | |
| download | linux-c3b880acadc95d6e019eae5d669e072afda24f1b.tar.xz linux-c3b880acadc95d6e019eae5d669e072afda24f1b.zip | |
xfs: fix ag count overflow during growfs
I found a corruption during growfs:
XFS (loop0): Internal error agbno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks at line 3661 of
file fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c. Caller __xfs_free_extent+0x28e/0x3c0
CPU: 0 PID: 573 Comm: xfs_growfs Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-next-20230420-00001-gda8c95746257
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x70
xfs_corruption_error+0x134/0x150
__xfs_free_extent+0x2c1/0x3c0
xfs_ag_extend_space+0x291/0x3e0
xfs_growfs_data+0xd72/0xe90
xfs_file_ioctl+0x5f9/0x14a0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x13e/0x1c0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
XFS (loop0): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
XFS (loop0): Internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1097 of file
fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller xfs_growfs_data+0x691/0xe90
CPU: 0 PID: 573 Comm: xfs_growfs Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-next-20230420-00001-gda8c95746257
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x50/0x70
xfs_error_report+0x93/0xc0
xfs_trans_cancel+0x2c0/0x350
xfs_growfs_data+0x691/0xe90
xfs_file_ioctl+0x5f9/0x14a0
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x13e/0x1c0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0x80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f2d86706577
The bug can be reproduced with the following sequence:
# truncate -s 1073741824 xfs_test.img
# mkfs.xfs -f -b size=1024 -d agcount=4 xfs_test.img
# truncate -s 2305843009213693952 xfs_test.img
# mount -o loop xfs_test.img /mnt/test
# xfs_growfs -D 1125899907891200 /mnt/test
The root cause is that during growfs, user space passed in a large value
of newblcoks to xfs_growfs_data_private(), due to current sb_agblocks is
too small, new AG count will exceed UINT_MAX. Because of AG number type
is unsigned int and it would overflow, that caused nagcount much smaller
than the actual value. During AG extent space, delta blocks in
xfs_resizefs_init_new_ags() will much larger than the actual value due to
incorrect nagcount, even exceed UINT_MAX. This will cause corruption and
be detected in __xfs_free_extent. Fix it by growing the filesystem to up
to the maximally allowed AGs and not return EINVAL when new AG count
overflow.
Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c index 5f00527b8065..839ca9a8d064 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_fsops.c @@ -115,11 +115,16 @@ xfs_growfs_data_private( nb_div = nb; nb_mod = do_div(nb_div, mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks); - nagcount = nb_div + (nb_mod != 0); - if (nb_mod && nb_mod < XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS) { - nagcount--; - nb = (xfs_rfsblock_t)nagcount * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks; + if (nb_mod && nb_mod >= XFS_MIN_AG_BLOCKS) + nb_div++; + else if (nb_mod) + nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks; + + if (nb_div > XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1) { + nb_div = XFS_MAX_AGNUMBER + 1; + nb = nb_div * mp->m_sb.sb_agblocks; } + nagcount = nb_div; delta = nb - mp->m_sb.sb_dblocks; /* * Reject filesystems with a single AG because they are not |