summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/trace
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>2015-05-08 14:23:45 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2015-05-19 08:39:18 +0200
commit80ed87c8a9ca0cad7ca66cf3bbdfb17559a66dcf (patch)
tree7da247bcde968e1ee6900dde15c875a44d145e3b /include/trace
parentsched/preempt, mm/fault: Decouple preemption from the page fault logic (diff)
downloadlinux-80ed87c8a9ca0cad7ca66cf3bbdfb17559a66dcf.tar.xz
linux-80ed87c8a9ca0cad7ca66cf3bbdfb17559a66dcf.zip
sched/wait: Introduce TASK_NOLOAD and TASK_IDLE
Currently people use TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE to idle kthreads and wait for 'work' because TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE contributes to the loadavg. Having all idle kthreads contribute to the loadavg is somewhat silly. Now mostly this works OK, because kthreads have all their signals masked. However there's a few sites where this is causing problems and TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE should be used, except for that loadavg issue. This patch adds TASK_NOLOAD which, when combined with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE avoids the loadavg accounting. As most of imagined usage sites are loops where a thread wants to idle, waiting for work, a helper TASK_IDLE is introduced. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/trace')
-rw-r--r--include/trace/events/sched.h3
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/trace/events/sched.h b/include/trace/events/sched.h
index 30fedaf3e56a..d57a575fe31f 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/sched.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/sched.h
@@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sched_switch,
__print_flags(__entry->prev_state & (TASK_STATE_MAX-1), "|",
{ 1, "S"} , { 2, "D" }, { 4, "T" }, { 8, "t" },
{ 16, "Z" }, { 32, "X" }, { 64, "x" },
- { 128, "K" }, { 256, "W" }, { 512, "P" }) : "R",
+ { 128, "K" }, { 256, "W" }, { 512, "P" },
+ { 1024, "N" }) : "R",
__entry->prev_state & TASK_STATE_MAX ? "+" : "",
__entry->next_comm, __entry->next_pid, __entry->next_prio)
);