diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-03-11 17:32:28 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-03-11 17:32:28 +0100 |
commit | 97ec9715a84e6f0979242e1ea98b9af1a39acf3b (patch) | |
tree | 8066ce2ee50e6ec5cb09bc131e0e5b2109823ba1 /lib | |
parent | Merge tag 'linux_kselftest-next-6.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linu... (diff) | |
parent | kunit: Annotate _MSG assertion variants with gnu printf specifiers (diff) | |
download | linux-97ec9715a84e6f0979242e1ea98b9af1a39acf3b.tar.xz linux-97ec9715a84e6f0979242e1ea98b9af1a39acf3b.zip |
Merge tag 'linux_kselftest-kunit-6.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan:
- fix to make kunit_bus_type const
- kunit tool change to Print UML command
- DRM device creation helpers are now using the new kunit device
creation helpers. This change resulted in DRM helpers switching from
using a platform_device, to a dedicated bus and device type used by
kunit. kunit devices don't set DMA mask and this caused regression on
some drm tests as they can't allocate DMA buffers. Fix this problem
by setting DMA masks on the kunit device during initialization.
- KUnit has several macros which accept a log message, which can
contain printf format specifiers. Some of these (the explicit log
macros) already use the __printf() gcc attribute to ensure the format
specifiers are valid, but those which could fail the test, and hence
used __kunit_do_failed_assertion() behind the scenes, did not.
These include: KUNIT_EXPECT_*_MSG(), KUNIT_ASSERT_*_MSG(), and
KUNIT_FAIL()
A nine-patch series adds the __printf() attribute, and fixes all of
the issues uncovered.
* tag 'linux_kselftest-kunit-6.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
kunit: Annotate _MSG assertion variants with gnu printf specifiers
drm: tests: Fix invalid printf format specifiers in KUnit tests
drm/xe/tests: Fix printf format specifiers in xe_migrate test
net: test: Fix printf format specifier in skb_segment kunit test
rtc: test: Fix invalid format specifier.
time: test: Fix incorrect format specifier
lib: memcpy_kunit: Fix an invalid format specifier in an assertion msg
lib/cmdline: Fix an invalid format specifier in an assertion msg
kunit: test: Log the correct filter string in executor_test
kunit: Setup DMA masks on the kunit device
kunit: make kunit_bus_type const
kunit: Mark filter* params as rw
kunit: tool: Print UML command
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/cmdline_kunit.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/kunit/device.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/kunit/executor.c | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/kunit/executor_test.c | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/memcpy_kunit.c | 4 |
5 files changed, 12 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c index d4572dbc9145..705b82736be0 100644 --- a/lib/cmdline_kunit.c +++ b/lib/cmdline_kunit.c @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void cmdline_do_one_range_test(struct kunit *test, const char *in, n, e[0], r[0]); p = memchr_inv(&r[1], 0, sizeof(r) - sizeof(r[0])); - KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %u out of bound", n, p - r); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, p, NULL, "in test %u at %td out of bound", n, p - r); } static void cmdline_test_range(struct kunit *test) diff --git a/lib/kunit/device.c b/lib/kunit/device.c index 644a38a1f5b1..abc603730b8e 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/device.c +++ b/lib/kunit/device.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ */ #include <linux/device.h> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h> #include <kunit/test.h> #include <kunit/device.h> @@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ struct kunit_device { #define to_kunit_device(d) container_of_const(d, struct kunit_device, dev) -static struct bus_type kunit_bus_type = { +static const struct bus_type kunit_bus_type = { .name = "kunit", }; @@ -133,6 +134,9 @@ static struct kunit_device *kunit_device_register_internal(struct kunit *test, return ERR_PTR(err); } + kunit_dev->dev.dma_mask = &kunit_dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask; + kunit_dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); + kunit_add_action(test, device_unregister_wrapper, &kunit_dev->dev); return kunit_dev; diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 689fff2b2b10..70b9a43cd257 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -33,13 +33,13 @@ static char *filter_glob_param; static char *filter_param; static char *filter_action_param; -module_param_named(filter_glob, filter_glob_param, charp, 0400); +module_param_named(filter_glob, filter_glob_param, charp, 0600); MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_glob, "Filter which KUnit test suites/tests run at boot-time, e.g. list* or list*.*del_test"); -module_param_named(filter, filter_param, charp, 0400); +module_param_named(filter, filter_param, charp, 0600); MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter, "Filter which KUnit test suites/tests run at boot-time using attributes, e.g. speed>slow"); -module_param_named(filter_action, filter_action_param, charp, 0400); +module_param_named(filter_action, filter_action_param, charp, 0600); MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_action, "Changes behavior of filtered tests using attributes, valid values are:\n" "<none>: do not run filtered tests as normal\n" diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c index 22d4ee86dbed..3f7f967e3688 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor_test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor_test.c @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static void parse_filter_attr_test(struct kunit *test) GFP_KERNEL); for (j = 0; j < filter_count; j++) { parsed_filters[j] = kunit_next_attr_filter(&filter, &err); - KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, err, 0, "failed to parse filter '%s'", filters[j]); + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, err, 0, "failed to parse filter from '%s'", filters); } KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, kunit_attr_filter_name(parsed_filters[0]), "speed"); diff --git a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c index 440aee705ccc..30e00ef0bf2e 100644 --- a/lib/memcpy_kunit.c +++ b/lib/memcpy_kunit.c @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct some_bytes { BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(instance.data) != 32); \ for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(instance.data); i++) { \ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, instance.data[i], v, \ - "line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %d (saw 0x%02x)\n", \ + "line %d: '%s' not initialized to 0x%02x @ %zu (saw 0x%02x)\n", \ __LINE__, #instance, v, i, instance.data[i]); \ } \ } while (0) @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ struct some_bytes { BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(one) != sizeof(two)); \ for (size_t i = 0; i < sizeof(one); i++) { \ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, one.data[i], two.data[i], \ - "line %d: %s.data[%d] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%d] (0x%02x)\n", \ + "line %d: %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x) != %s.data[%zu] (0x%02x)\n", \ __LINE__, #one, i, one.data[i], #two, i, two.data[i]); \ } \ kunit_info(test, "ok: " TEST_OP "() " name "\n"); \ |