diff options
author | Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> | 2021-11-21 21:40:07 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-11-22 20:36:46 +0100 |
commit | a4a118f2eead1d6c49e00765de89878288d4b890 (patch) | |
tree | 7c9e3e8438aade896ac0a9ee6361da8571891ca9 /mm/hugetlb.c | |
parent | Linux 5.16-rc2 (diff) | |
download | linux-a4a118f2eead1d6c49e00765de89878288d4b890.tar.xz linux-a4a118f2eead1d6c49e00765de89878288d4b890.zip |
hugetlbfs: flush TLBs correctly after huge_pmd_unshare
When __unmap_hugepage_range() calls to huge_pmd_unshare() succeed, a TLB
flush is missing. This TLB flush must be performed before releasing the
i_mmap_rwsem, in order to prevent an unshared PMDs page from being
released and reused before the TLB flush took place.
Arguably, a comprehensive solution would use mmu_gather interface to
batch the TLB flushes and the PMDs page release, however it is not an
easy solution: (1) try_to_unmap_one() and try_to_migrate_one() also call
huge_pmd_unshare() and they cannot use the mmu_gather interface; and (2)
deferring the release of the page reference for the PMDs page until
after i_mmap_rwsem is dropeed can confuse huge_pmd_unshare() into
thinking PMDs are shared when they are not.
Fix __unmap_hugepage_range() by adding the missing TLB flush, and
forcing a flush when unshare is successful.
Fixes: 24669e58477e ("hugetlb: use mmu_gather instead of a temporary linked list for accumulating pages)" # 3.6
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/hugetlb.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/hugetlb.c | 23 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c index f025d234522f..2ccebe1ca9f4 100644 --- a/mm/hugetlb.c +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c @@ -4939,6 +4939,7 @@ static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma); unsigned long sz = huge_page_size(h); struct mmu_notifier_range range; + bool force_flush = false; WARN_ON(!is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)); BUG_ON(start & ~huge_page_mask(h)); @@ -4967,10 +4968,8 @@ static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep); if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, vma, &address, ptep)) { spin_unlock(ptl); - /* - * We just unmapped a page of PMDs by clearing a PUD. - * The caller's TLB flush range should cover this area. - */ + tlb_flush_pmd_range(tlb, address & PUD_MASK, PUD_SIZE); + force_flush = true; continue; } @@ -5027,6 +5026,22 @@ static void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct } mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range); tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma); + + /* + * If we unshared PMDs, the TLB flush was not recorded in mmu_gather. We + * could defer the flush until now, since by holding i_mmap_rwsem we + * guaranteed that the last refernece would not be dropped. But we must + * do the flushing before we return, as otherwise i_mmap_rwsem will be + * dropped and the last reference to the shared PMDs page might be + * dropped as well. + * + * In theory we could defer the freeing of the PMD pages as well, but + * huge_pmd_unshare() relies on the exact page_count for the PMD page to + * detect sharing, so we cannot defer the release of the page either. + * Instead, do flush now. + */ + if (force_flush) + tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb); } void __unmap_hugepage_range_final(struct mmu_gather *tlb, |