mm: reorganize SLAB freelist randomization

The kernel heap allocators are using a sequential freelist making their
allocation predictable.  This predictability makes kernel heap overflow
easier to exploit.  An attacker can careful prepare the kernel heap to
control the following chunk overflowed.

For example these attacks exploit the predictability of the heap:
 - Linux Kernel CAN SLUB overflow (https://goo.gl/oMNWkU)
 - Exploiting Linux Kernel Heap corruptions (http://goo.gl/EXLn95)

***Problems that needed solving:
 - Randomize the Freelist (singled linked) used in the SLUB allocator.
 - Ensure good performance to encourage usage.
 - Get best entropy in early boot stage.

***Parts:
 - 01/02 Reorganize the SLAB Freelist randomization to share elements
   with the SLUB implementation.
 - 02/02 The SLUB Freelist randomization implementation. Similar approach
   than the SLAB but tailored to the singled freelist used in SLUB.

***Performance data:

slab_test impact is between 3% to 4% on average for 100000 attempts
without smp.  It is a very focused testing, kernbench show the overall
impact on the system is way lower.

Before:

  Single thread testing
  =====================
  1. Kmalloc: Repeatedly allocate then free test
  100000 times kmalloc(8) -> 49 cycles kfree -> 77 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(16) -> 51 cycles kfree -> 79 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(32) -> 53 cycles kfree -> 83 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(64) -> 62 cycles kfree -> 90 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(128) -> 81 cycles kfree -> 97 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(256) -> 98 cycles kfree -> 121 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(512) -> 95 cycles kfree -> 122 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(1024) -> 96 cycles kfree -> 126 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(2048) -> 115 cycles kfree -> 140 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(4096) -> 149 cycles kfree -> 171 cycles
  2. Kmalloc: alloc/free test
  100000 times kmalloc(8)/kfree -> 70 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(16)/kfree -> 70 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(32)/kfree -> 70 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(64)/kfree -> 70 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(128)/kfree -> 70 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(256)/kfree -> 69 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(512)/kfree -> 70 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(1024)/kfree -> 73 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(2048)/kfree -> 72 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(4096)/kfree -> 71 cycles

After:

  Single thread testing
  =====================
  1. Kmalloc: Repeatedly allocate then free test
  100000 times kmalloc(8) -> 57 cycles kfree -> 78 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(16) -> 61 cycles kfree -> 81 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(32) -> 76 cycles kfree -> 93 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(64) -> 83 cycles kfree -> 94 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(128) -> 106 cycles kfree -> 107 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(256) -> 118 cycles kfree -> 117 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(512) -> 114 cycles kfree -> 116 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(1024) -> 115 cycles kfree -> 118 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(2048) -> 147 cycles kfree -> 131 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(4096) -> 214 cycles kfree -> 161 cycles
  2. Kmalloc: alloc/free test
  100000 times kmalloc(8)/kfree -> 66 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(16)/kfree -> 66 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(32)/kfree -> 66 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(64)/kfree -> 66 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(128)/kfree -> 65 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(256)/kfree -> 67 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(512)/kfree -> 67 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(1024)/kfree -> 64 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(2048)/kfree -> 67 cycles
  100000 times kmalloc(4096)/kfree -> 67 cycles

Kernbench, before:

  Average Optimal load -j 12 Run (std deviation):
  Elapsed Time 101.873 (1.16069)
  User Time 1045.22 (1.60447)
  System Time 88.969 (0.559195)
  Percent CPU 1112.9 (13.8279)
  Context Switches 189140 (2282.15)
  Sleeps 99008.6 (768.091)

After:

  Average Optimal load -j 12 Run (std deviation):
  Elapsed Time 102.47 (0.562732)
  User Time 1045.3 (1.34263)
  System Time 88.311 (0.342554)
  Percent CPU 1105.8 (6.49444)
  Context Switches 189081 (2355.78)
  Sleeps 99231.5 (800.358)

This patch (of 2):

This commit reorganizes the previous SLAB freelist randomization to
prepare for the SLUB implementation.  It moves functions that will be
shared to slab_common.

The entropy functions are changed to align with the SLUB implementation,
now using get_random_(int|long) functions.  These functions were chosen
because they provide a bit more entropy early on boot and better
performance when specific arch instructions are not available.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464295031-26375-2-git-send-email-thgarnie@google.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/slab.h b/mm/slab.h
index dedb1a920fb8..5fa8b8f20eb1 100644
--- a/mm/slab.h
+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct kmem_cache {
 #include <linux/kmemcheck.h>
 #include <linux/kasan.h>
 #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
 
 /*
  * State of the slab allocator.
@@ -464,4 +465,17 @@ int memcg_slab_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p);
 
 void ___cache_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *x, unsigned long addr);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM
+int cache_random_seq_create(struct kmem_cache *cachep, unsigned int count,
+			gfp_t gfp);
+void cache_random_seq_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cachep);
+#else
+static inline int cache_random_seq_create(struct kmem_cache *cachep,
+					unsigned int count, gfp_t gfp)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+static inline void cache_random_seq_destroy(struct kmem_cache *cachep) { }
+#endif /* CONFIG_SLAB_FREELIST_RANDOM */
+
 #endif /* MM_SLAB_H */