perf pmus: Allow just core PMU scanning

Scanning all PMUs is expensive as all PMUs sysfs entries are loaded,
benchmarking shows more than 4x the cost:

```
$ perf bench internals pmu-scan -i 1000
Computing performance of sysfs PMU event scan for 1000 times
  Average core PMU scanning took: 989.231 usec (+- 1.535 usec)
  Average PMU scanning took: 4309.425 usec (+- 74.322 usec)
```

Add new perf_pmus__scan_core routine that scans just core
PMUs. Replace perf_pmus__scan calls with perf_pmus__scan_core when
non-core PMUs are being ignored.

Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ali Saidi <alisaidi@amazon.com>
Cc: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@gmail.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Ming Wang <wangming01@loongson.cn>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230527072210.2900565-30-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
index 08ac3ea2e366..c5596230a308 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/mem-events.c
@@ -136,10 +136,7 @@ int perf_mem_events__init(void)
 		} else {
 			struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
 
-			while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan(pmu)) != NULL) {
-				if (!pmu->is_core)
-					continue;
-
+			while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu)) != NULL) {
 				scnprintf(sysfs_name, sizeof(sysfs_name),
 					  e->sysfs_name, pmu->name);
 				e->supported |= perf_mem_event__supported(mnt, sysfs_name);
@@ -176,10 +173,7 @@ static void perf_mem_events__print_unsupport_hybrid(struct perf_mem_event *e,
 	char sysfs_name[100];
 	struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
 
-	while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan(pmu)) != NULL) {
-		if (!pmu->is_core)
-			continue;
-
+	while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu)) != NULL) {
 		scnprintf(sysfs_name, sizeof(sysfs_name), e->sysfs_name,
 			  pmu->name);
 		if (!perf_mem_event__supported(mnt, sysfs_name)) {
@@ -217,9 +211,7 @@ int perf_mem_events__record_args(const char **rec_argv, int *argv_nr,
 				return -1;
 			}
 
-			while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan(pmu)) != NULL) {
-				if (!pmu->is_core)
-					continue;
+			while ((pmu = perf_pmus__scan_core(pmu)) != NULL) {
 				rec_argv[i++] = "-e";
 				s = perf_mem_events__name(j, pmu->name);
 				if (s) {