selftests/bpf: Add selftests for bpf_task_from_pid()

Add some selftest testcases that validate the expected behavior of the
bpf_task_from_pid() kfunc that was added in the prior patch.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221122145300.251210-3-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

3 files changed, 87 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
index 160d6dde00be..c0ffd171743e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_common.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ struct hash_map {
 struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
 struct task_struct *bpf_task_kptr_get(struct task_struct **pp) __ksym;
 void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p) __ksym;
+struct task_struct *bpf_task_from_pid(s32 pid) __ksym;
 
 static inline struct __tasks_kfunc_map_value *tasks_kfunc_map_value_lookup(struct task_struct *p)
 {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
index 93e934ddfcb6..e310473190d5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
@@ -258,3 +258,16 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_release_unacquired, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_pid_no_null_check, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct task_struct *acquired;
+
+	acquired = bpf_task_from_pid(task->pid);
+
+	/* Releasing bpf_task_from_pid() lookup without a NULL check. */
+	bpf_task_release(acquired);
+
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
index be4534b5ba2e..60c7ead41cfc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
@@ -147,3 +147,76 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_task_current_acquire_release, struct task_struct *task, u64 cl
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static void lookup_compare_pid(const struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct task_struct *acquired;
+
+	acquired = bpf_task_from_pid(p->pid);
+	if (!acquired) {
+		err = 1;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (acquired->pid != p->pid)
+		err = 2;
+	bpf_task_release(acquired);
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_task_from_pid_arg, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct task_struct *acquired;
+
+	if (!is_test_kfunc_task())
+		return 0;
+
+	lookup_compare_pid(task);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_task_from_pid_current, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct task_struct *current, *acquired;
+
+	if (!is_test_kfunc_task())
+		return 0;
+
+	lookup_compare_pid(bpf_get_current_task_btf());
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int is_pid_lookup_valid(s32 pid)
+{
+	struct task_struct *acquired;
+
+	acquired = bpf_task_from_pid(pid);
+	if (acquired) {
+		bpf_task_release(acquired);
+		return 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+int BPF_PROG(test_task_from_pid_invalid, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	struct task_struct *acquired;
+
+	if (!is_test_kfunc_task())
+		return 0;
+
+	if (is_pid_lookup_valid(-1)) {
+		err = 1;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (is_pid_lookup_valid(0xcafef00d)) {
+		err = 2;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}