diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 72 |
1 files changed, 69 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 82af971926ac..a0b8e400b3df 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1155,6 +1155,12 @@ static bool is_spilled_scalar_reg(const struct bpf_stack_state *stack) stack->spilled_ptr.type == SCALAR_VALUE; } +static bool is_spilled_scalar_reg64(const struct bpf_stack_state *stack) +{ + return stack->slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL && + stack->spilled_ptr.type == SCALAR_VALUE; +} + /* Mark stack slot as STACK_MISC, unless it is already STACK_INVALID, in which * case they are equivalent, or it's STACK_ZERO, in which case we preserve * more precise STACK_ZERO. @@ -2264,8 +2270,7 @@ static void __reg_assign_32_into_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) } /* Mark a register as having a completely unknown (scalar) value. */ -static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static void __mark_reg_unknown_imprecise(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { /* * Clear type, off, and union(map_ptr, range) and @@ -2277,10 +2282,20 @@ static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, reg->ref_obj_id = 0; reg->var_off = tnum_unknown; reg->frameno = 0; - reg->precise = !env->bpf_capable; + reg->precise = false; __mark_reg_unbounded(reg); } +/* Mark a register as having a completely unknown (scalar) value, + * initialize .precise as true when not bpf capable. + */ +static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + __mark_reg_unknown_imprecise(reg); + reg->precise = !env->bpf_capable; +} + static void mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) { @@ -16486,6 +16501,43 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *rold, } } +static struct bpf_reg_state unbound_reg; + +static __init int unbound_reg_init(void) +{ + __mark_reg_unknown_imprecise(&unbound_reg); + unbound_reg.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + return 0; +} +late_initcall(unbound_reg_init); + +static bool is_stack_all_misc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_stack_state *stack) +{ + u32 i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stack->slot_type); ++i) { + if ((stack->slot_type[i] == STACK_MISC) || + (stack->slot_type[i] == STACK_INVALID && env->allow_uninit_stack)) + continue; + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +static struct bpf_reg_state *scalar_reg_for_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_stack_state *stack) +{ + if (is_spilled_scalar_reg64(stack)) + return &stack->spilled_ptr; + + if (is_stack_all_misc(env, stack)) + return &unbound_reg; + + return NULL; +} + static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, struct bpf_func_state *cur, struct bpf_idmap *idmap, bool exact) { @@ -16524,6 +16576,20 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, if (i >= cur->allocated_stack) return false; + /* 64-bit scalar spill vs all slots MISC and vice versa. + * Load from all slots MISC produces unbound scalar. + * Construct a fake register for such stack and call + * regsafe() to ensure scalar ids are compared. + */ + old_reg = scalar_reg_for_stack(env, &old->stack[spi]); + cur_reg = scalar_reg_for_stack(env, &cur->stack[spi]); + if (old_reg && cur_reg) { + if (!regsafe(env, old_reg, cur_reg, idmap, exact)) + return false; + i += BPF_REG_SIZE - 1; + continue; + } + /* if old state was safe with misc data in the stack * it will be safe with zero-initialized stack. * The opposite is not true |