diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 188 |
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 47 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 42e2f1fbbd5f..6644974a4f5a 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -2100,22 +2100,72 @@ check_redundant(struct held_lock *src, struct held_lock *target) #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS +/* + * Forwards and backwards subgraph searching, for the purposes of + * proving that two subgraphs can be connected by a new dependency + * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency. + * + * A irq safe->unsafe deadlock happens with the following conditions: + * + * 1) We have a strong dependency path A -> ... -> B + * + * 2) and we have ENABLED_IRQ usage of B and USED_IN_IRQ usage of A, therefore + * irq can create a new dependency B -> A (consider the case that a holder + * of B gets interrupted by an irq whose handler will try to acquire A). + * + * 3) the dependency circle A -> ... -> B -> A we get from 1) and 2) is a + * strong circle: + * + * For the usage bits of B: + * a) if A -> B is -(*N)->, then B -> A could be any type, so any + * ENABLED_IRQ usage suffices. + * b) if A -> B is -(*R)->, then B -> A must be -(E*)->, so only + * ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ usage suffices. + * + * For the usage bits of A: + * c) if A -> B is -(E*)->, then B -> A could be any type, so any + * USED_IN_IRQ usage suffices. + * d) if A -> B is -(S*)->, then B -> A must be -(*N)->, so only + * USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ usage suffices. + */ + +/* + * There is a strong dependency path in the dependency graph: A -> B, and now + * we need to decide which usage bit of A should be accumulated to detect + * safe->unsafe bugs. + * + * Note that usage_accumulate() is used in backwards search, so ->only_xr + * stands for whether A -> B only has -(S*)-> (in this case ->only_xr is true). + * + * As above, if only_xr is false, which means A -> B has -(E*)-> dependency + * path, any usage of A should be considered. Otherwise, we should only + * consider _READ usage. + */ static inline bool usage_accumulate(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask) { - *(unsigned long *)mask |= entry->class->usage_mask; + if (!entry->only_xr) + *(unsigned long *)mask |= entry->class->usage_mask; + else /* Mask out _READ usage bits */ + *(unsigned long *)mask |= (entry->class->usage_mask & LOCKF_IRQ); return false; } /* - * Forwards and backwards subgraph searching, for the purposes of - * proving that two subgraphs can be connected by a new dependency - * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency. + * There is a strong dependency path in the dependency graph: A -> B, and now + * we need to decide which usage bit of B conflicts with the usage bits of A, + * i.e. which usage bit of B may introduce safe->unsafe deadlocks. + * + * As above, if only_xr is false, which means A -> B has -(*N)-> dependency + * path, any usage of B should be considered. Otherwise, we should only + * consider _READ usage. */ - static inline bool usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *mask) { - return !!(entry->class->usage_mask & *(unsigned long *)mask); + if (!entry->only_xr) + return !!(entry->class->usage_mask & *(unsigned long *)mask); + else /* Mask out _READ usage bits */ + return !!((entry->class->usage_mask & LOCKF_IRQ) & *(unsigned long *)mask); } /* @@ -2406,17 +2456,39 @@ static unsigned long invert_dir_mask(unsigned long mask) } /* - * As above, we clear bitnr0 (LOCK_*_READ off) with bitmask ops. First, for all - * bits with bitnr0 set (LOCK_*_READ), add those with bitnr0 cleared (LOCK_*). - * And then mask out all bitnr0. + * Note that a LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ usage and a LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ + * usage may cause deadlock too, for example: + * + * P1 P2 + * <irq disabled> + * write_lock(l1); <irq enabled> + * read_lock(l2); + * write_lock(l2); + * <in irq> + * read_lock(l1); + * + * , in above case, l1 will be marked as LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_HARDIRQ_READ and l2 + * will marked as LOCK_ENABLE_IRQ_HARDIRQ_READ, and this is a possible + * deadlock. + * + * In fact, all of the following cases may cause deadlocks: + * + * LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_* + * LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_* + * LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_* -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ + * LOCK_USED_IN_IRQ_*_READ -> LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ + * + * As a result, to calculate the "exclusive mask", first we invert the + * direction (USED_IN/ENABLED) of the original mask, and 1) for all bits with + * bitnr0 set (LOCK_*_READ), add those with bitnr0 cleared (LOCK_*). 2) for all + * bits with bitnr0 cleared (LOCK_*_READ), add those with bitnr0 set (LOCK_*). */ static unsigned long exclusive_mask(unsigned long mask) { unsigned long excl = invert_dir_mask(mask); - /* Strip read */ excl |= (excl & LOCKF_IRQ_READ) >> LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; - excl &= ~LOCKF_IRQ_READ; + excl |= (excl & LOCKF_IRQ) << LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; return excl; } @@ -2433,6 +2505,7 @@ static unsigned long original_mask(unsigned long mask) unsigned long excl = invert_dir_mask(mask); /* Include read in existing usages */ + excl |= (excl & LOCKF_IRQ_READ) >> LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; excl |= (excl & LOCKF_IRQ) << LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; return excl; @@ -2447,14 +2520,24 @@ static int find_exclusive_match(unsigned long mask, enum lock_usage_bit *bitp, enum lock_usage_bit *excl_bitp) { - int bit, excl; + int bit, excl, excl_read; for_each_set_bit(bit, &mask, LOCK_USED) { + /* + * exclusive_bit() strips the read bit, however, + * LOCK_ENABLED_IRQ_*_READ may cause deadlocks too, so we need + * to search excl | LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK as well. + */ excl = exclusive_bit(bit); + excl_read = excl | LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; if (excl_mask & lock_flag(excl)) { *bitp = bit; *excl_bitp = excl; return 0; + } else if (excl_mask & lock_flag(excl_read)) { + *bitp = bit; + *excl_bitp = excl_read; + return 0; } } return -1; @@ -2480,8 +2563,7 @@ static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, * Step 1: gather all hard/soft IRQs usages backward in an * accumulated usage mask. */ - this.parent = NULL; - this.class = hlock_class(prev); + bfs_init_rootb(&this, prev); ret = __bfs_backwards(&this, &usage_mask, usage_accumulate, NULL); if (bfs_error(ret)) { @@ -2499,8 +2581,7 @@ static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev, */ forward_mask = exclusive_mask(usage_mask); - that.parent = NULL; - that.class = hlock_class(next); + bfs_init_root(&that, next); ret = find_usage_forwards(&that, forward_mask, &target_entry1); if (bfs_error(ret)) { @@ -3695,14 +3776,16 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, */ static int check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *irqclass) + enum lock_usage_bit bit) { enum bfs_result ret; struct lock_list root; struct lock_list *target_entry; + enum lock_usage_bit read_bit = bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; + unsigned usage_mask = lock_flag(bit) | lock_flag(read_bit); bfs_init_root(&root, this); - ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, lock_flag(bit), &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, usage_mask, &target_entry); if (bfs_error(ret)) { print_bfs_bug(ret); return 0; @@ -3710,8 +3793,15 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, if (ret == BFS_RNOMATCH) return 1; - print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry, - this, 1, irqclass); + /* Check whether write or read usage is the match */ + if (target_entry->class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit)) { + print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry, + this, 1, state_name(bit)); + } else { + print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry, + this, 1, state_name(read_bit)); + } + return 0; } @@ -3721,14 +3811,16 @@ check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, */ static int check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, - enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *irqclass) + enum lock_usage_bit bit) { enum bfs_result ret; struct lock_list root; struct lock_list *target_entry; + enum lock_usage_bit read_bit = bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK; + unsigned usage_mask = lock_flag(bit) | lock_flag(read_bit); bfs_init_rootb(&root, this); - ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, lock_flag(bit), &target_entry); + ret = find_usage_backwards(&root, usage_mask, &target_entry); if (bfs_error(ret)) { print_bfs_bug(ret); return 0; @@ -3736,8 +3828,15 @@ check_usage_backwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, if (ret == BFS_RNOMATCH) return 1; - print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry, - this, 0, irqclass); + /* Check whether write or read usage is the match */ + if (target_entry->class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit)) { + print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry, + this, 0, state_name(bit)); + } else { + print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, &root, target_entry, + this, 0, state_name(read_bit)); + } + return 0; } @@ -3776,8 +3875,6 @@ static int SOFTIRQ_verbose(struct lock_class *class) return 0; } -#define STRICT_READ_CHECKS 1 - static int (*state_verbose_f[])(struct lock_class *class) = { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ __STATE##_verbose, @@ -3803,16 +3900,6 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, int dir = new_bit & LOCK_USAGE_DIR_MASK; /* - * mark USED_IN has to look forwards -- to ensure no dependency - * has ENABLED state, which would allow recursion deadlocks. - * - * mark ENABLED has to look backwards -- to ensure no dependee - * has USED_IN state, which, again, would allow recursion deadlocks. - */ - check_usage_f usage = dir ? - check_usage_backwards : check_usage_forwards; - - /* * Validate that this particular lock does not have conflicting * usage states. */ @@ -3820,23 +3907,30 @@ mark_lock_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, return 0; /* - * Validate that the lock dependencies don't have conflicting usage - * states. + * Check for read in write conflicts */ - if ((!read || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) + if (!read && !valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, + excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)) return 0; + /* - * Check for read in write conflicts + * Validate that the lock dependencies don't have conflicting usage + * states. */ - if (!read) { - if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)) + if (dir) { + /* + * mark ENABLED has to look backwards -- to ensure no dependee + * has USED_IN state, which, again, would allow recursion deadlocks. + */ + if (!check_usage_backwards(curr, this, excl_bit)) return 0; - - if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS && - !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK, - state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) + } else { + /* + * mark USED_IN has to look forwards -- to ensure no dependency + * has ENABLED state, which would allow recursion deadlocks. + */ + if (!check_usage_forwards(curr, this, excl_bit)) return 0; } |