summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/objtool/check.c (follow)
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* objtool: Handle another GCC stack pointer adjustment bugJosh Poimboeuf2017-09-231-14/+29
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The kbuild bot reported the following warning with GCC 4.4 and a randconfig: net/socket.o: warning: objtool: compat_sock_ioctl()+0x1083: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+160 cfa2=-1+0 This is caused by another GCC non-optimization, where it backs up and restores the stack pointer for no apparent reason: 2f91: 48 89 e0 mov %rsp,%rax 2f94: 4c 89 e7 mov %r12,%rdi 2f97: 4c 89 f6 mov %r14,%rsi 2f9a: ba 20 00 00 00 mov $0x20,%edx 2f9f: 48 89 c4 mov %rax,%rsp This issue would have been happily ignored before the following commit: dd88a0a0c861 ("objtool: Handle GCC stack pointer adjustment bug") But now that objtool is paying attention to such stack pointer writes to/from a register, it needs to understand them properly. In this case that means recognizing that the "mov %rsp, %rax" instruction is potentially a backup of the stack pointer. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Miguel Bernal Marin <miguel.bernal.marin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: dd88a0a0c861 ("objtool: Handle GCC stack pointer adjustment bug") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8c7aa8e9a36fbbb6655d9d8e7cea58958c912da8.1505942196.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Handle GCC stack pointer adjustment bugJosh Poimboeuf2017-08-301-21/+60
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Arnd Bergmann reported the following warning with GCC 7.1.1: fs/fs_pin.o: warning: objtool: pin_kill()+0x139: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+88 cfa2=7+96 And the kbuild robot reported the following warnings with GCC 5.4.1: fs/fs_pin.o: warning: objtool: pin_kill()+0x182: return with modified stack frame fs/quota/dquot.o: warning: objtool: dquot_alloc_inode()+0x140: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+120 cfa2=7+128 fs/quota/dquot.o: warning: objtool: dquot_free_inode()+0x11a: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+112 cfa2=7+120 Those warnings are caused by an unusual GCC non-optimization where it uses an intermediate register to adjust the stack pointer. It does: lea 0x8(%rsp), %rcx ... mov %rcx, %rsp Instead of the obvious: add $0x8, %rsp It makes no sense to use an intermediate register, so I opened a GCC bug to track it: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81813 But it's not exactly a high-priority bug and it looks like we'll be stuck with this issue for a while. So for now we have to track register values when they're loaded with stack pointer offsets. This is kind of a big workaround for a tiny problem, but c'est la vie. I hope to eventually create a GCC plugin to implement a big chunk of objtool's functionality. Hopefully at that point we'll be able to remove of a lot of these GCC-isms from the objtool code. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6a41a96884c725e7f05413bb7df40cfe824b2444.1504028945.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Fix objtool fallthrough detection with function paddingJosh Poimboeuf2017-08-211-7/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When GCC adds NOP padding between functions, those NOPs aren't associated with a function symbol, which breaks objtool's detection of a function falling through to another function. Instead it shows confusing errors like: drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.o: warning: objtool: cfi_qry_mode_on()+0x8b: return with modified stack frame drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.o: warning: objtool: cfi_qry_mode_on()+0x0: stack state mismatch: cfa1=-4-32 cfa2=7+8 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.o: warning: objtool: fixup_use_fwh_lock()+0x8: unknown stack-related register move drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.o: warning: objtool: fixup_use_fwh_lock()+0x0: stack state mismatch: cfa1=6+16 cfa2=7+8 drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.o: warning: objtool: do_otp_write()+0xa: unsupported stack pointer realignment drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.o: warning: objtool: do_otp_write()+0x0: stack state mismatch: cfa1=-4-40 cfa2=7+8 Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/43e7aae9a7a7710cd6df597fa9dc501da4ba0602.1502472193.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Track DRAP separately from callee-saved registersJosh Poimboeuf2017-08-111-24/+30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When GCC realigns a function's stack, it sometimes uses %r13 as the DRAP register, like: push %r13 lea 0x10(%rsp), %r13 and $0xfffffffffffffff0, %rsp pushq -0x8(%r13) push %rbp mov %rsp, %rbp push %r13 ... mov -0x8(%rbp),%r13 leaveq lea -0x10(%r13), %rsp pop %r13 retq Since %r13 was pushed onto the stack twice, its two stack locations need to be stored separately. The first push of %r13 is its original value, and the second push of %r13 is the caller's stack frame address. Since %r13 is a callee-saved register, we need to track the stack location of its original value separately from the DRAP register. This fixes the following false positive warning: lib/ubsan.o: warning: objtool: val_to_string.constprop.7()+0x97: leave instruction with modified stack frame Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: baa41469a7b9 ("objtool: Implement stack validation 2.0") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3da23a6d4c5b3c1e21fc2ccc21a73941b97ff20a.1502401017.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Fix validate_branch() return codesJosh Poimboeuf2017-08-111-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The validate_branch() function should never return a negative value. Errors are treated as warnings so that even if something goes wrong, objtool does its best to generate ORC data for the rest of the file. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: baa41469a7b9 ("objtool: Implement stack validation 2.0") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/d86671cfde823b50477cd2f6f548dfe54871e24d.1502401017.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Skip unreachable warnings for 'alt' instructionsJosh Poimboeuf2017-07-281-1/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When a whitelisted function uses one of the ALTERNATIVE macros, it produces false positive warnings like: arch/x86/kvm/vmx.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x0: unreachable instruction arch/x86/kvm/svm.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x6e: unreachable instruction There's no easy way to whitelist alternative instructions, so instead just skip any 'unreachable' warnings associated with them. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a5d0a8c60155f03b36a31fac871e12cf75f35fd0.1501188854.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Assume unannotated UD2 instructions are dead endsJosh Poimboeuf2017-07-281-2/+55
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Arnd reported some false positive warnings with GCC 7: drivers/hid/wacom_wac.o: warning: objtool: wacom_bpt3_touch()+0x2a5: stack state mismatch: cfa1=7+8 cfa2=6+16 drivers/iio/adc/vf610_adc.o: warning: objtool: vf610_adc_calculate_rates() falls through to next function vf610_adc_sample_set() drivers/pwm/pwm-hibvt.o: warning: objtool: hibvt_pwm_get_state() falls through to next function hibvt_pwm_remove() drivers/pwm/pwm-mediatek.o: warning: objtool: mtk_pwm_config() falls through to next function mtk_pwm_enable() drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835aux.o: warning: objtool: .text: unexpected end of section drivers/watchdog/digicolor_wdt.o: warning: objtool: dc_wdt_get_timeleft() falls through to next function dc_wdt_restart() When GCC 7 detects a potential divide-by-zero condition, it sometimes inserts a UD2 instruction for the case where the divisor is zero, instead of letting the hardware trap on the divide instruction. Objtool doesn't consider UD2 to be fatal unless it's annotated with unreachable(). So it considers the GCC-generated UD2 to be non-fatal, and it tries to follow the control flow past the UD2 and gets confused. Previously, objtool *did* assume UD2 was always a dead end. That changed with the following commit: d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends") The motivation behind that change was that Peter was planning on using UD2 for __WARN(), which is *not* a dead end. However, it turns out that some emulators rely on UD2 being fatal, so he ended up using 'ud0' instead: 9a93848fe787 ("x86/debug: Implement __WARN() using UD0") For GCC 4.5+, it should be safe to go back to the previous assumption that UD2 is fatal, even when it's not annotated with unreachable(). But for pre-4.5 versions of GCC, the unreachable() macro isn't supported, so such cases of UD2 need to be explicitly annotated as reachable. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: d1091c7fa3d5 ("objtool: Improve detection of BUG() and other dead ends") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e57fa9dfede25f79487da8126ee9cdf7b856db65.1501188854.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Fix gcov check for older versions of GCCJosh Poimboeuf2017-07-251-29/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Objtool tries to silence 'unreachable instruction' warnings when it detects gcov is enabled, because gcov produces a lot of unreachable instructions and they don't really matter. However, the 0-day bot is still reporting some unreachable instruction warnings with CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y on GCC 4.6.4. As it turns out, objtool's gcov detection doesn't work with older versions of GCC because they don't create a bunch of symbols with the 'gcov.' prefix like newer versions of GCC do. Move the gcov check out of objtool and instead just create a new '--no-unreachable' flag which can be passed in by the kernel Makefile when CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL is defined. Also rename the 'nofp' variable to 'no_fp' for consistency with the new 'no_unreachable' variable. Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 9cfffb116887 ("objtool: Skip all "unreachable instruction" warnings for gcov kernels") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c243dc78eb2ffdabb6e927844dea39b6033cd395.1500939244.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool, x86: Add facility for asm code to provide unwind hintsJosh Poimboeuf2017-07-181-11/+180
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some asm (and inline asm) code does special things to the stack which objtool can't understand. (Nor can GCC or GNU assembler, for that matter.) In such cases we need a facility for the code to provide annotations, so the unwinder can unwind through it. This provides such a facility, in the form of unwind hints. They're similar to the GNU assembler .cfi* directives, but they give more information, and are needed in far fewer places, because objtool can fill in the blanks by following branches and adjusting the stack pointer for pushes and pops. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/0f5f3c9104fca559ff4088bece1d14ae3bca52d5.1499786555.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Add ORC unwind table generationJosh Poimboeuf2017-07-181-4/+54
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that objtool knows the states of all registers on the stack for each instruction, it's straightforward to generate debuginfo for an unwinder to use. Instead of generating DWARF, generate a new format called ORC, which is more suitable for an in-kernel unwinder. See Documentation/x86/orc-unwinder.txt for a more detailed description of this new debuginfo format and why it's preferable to DWARF. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c9b9f01ba6c5ed2bdc9bb0957b78167fdbf9632e.1499786555.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Fix sibling call detection logicJosh Poimboeuf2017-07-081-2/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | With some configs, objtool reports the following warning: arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.o: warning: objtool: ftrace_modify_code_direct()+0x2d: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame The instruction it's complaining about isn't actually a sibling call. It's just a normal jump to an address inside the function. Objtool thought it was a sibling call because the instruction's jump_dest wasn't initialized because the function was supposed to be ignored due to its use of sync_core(). Objtool ended up validating the function instead of ignoring it because it didn't properly recognize a sibling call to the function. So fix the sibling call logic. Also add a warning to catch ignored functions being validated so we'll get a more useful error message next time. Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/96cc8ecbcdd8cb29ddd783817b4af918a6a171b0.1499437107.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Silence warnings for functions which use IRETJosh Poimboeuf2017-06-301-8/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Previously, objtool ignored functions which have the IRET instruction in them. That's because it assumed that such functions know what they're doing with respect to frame pointers. With the new "objtool 2.0" changes, it stopped ignoring such functions, and started complaining about them: arch/x86/kernel/alternative.o: warning: objtool: do_sync_core()+0x1b: unsupported instruction in callable function arch/x86/kernel/alternative.o: warning: objtool: text_poke()+0x1a8: unsupported instruction in callable function arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.o: warning: objtool: do_sync_core()+0x16: unsupported instruction in callable function arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o: warning: objtool: machine_check_poll()+0x166: unsupported instruction in callable function arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.o: warning: objtool: do_machine_check()+0x147: unsupported instruction in callable function Silence those warnings for now. They can be re-enabled later, once we have unwind hints which will allow the code to annotate the IRET usages. Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Fixes: baa41469a7b9 ("objtool: Implement stack validation 2.0") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170630140934.mmwtpockvpupahro@treble Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Implement stack validation 2.0Josh Poimboeuf2017-06-301-141/+535
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a major rewrite of objtool. Instead of only tracking frame pointer changes, it now tracks all stack-related operations, including all register saves/restores. In addition to making stack validation more robust, this also paves the way for undwarf generation. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/678bd94c0566c6129bcc376cddb259c4c5633004.1498659915.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* objtool: Move checking code to check.cJosh Poimboeuf2017-06-301-0/+1263
In preparation for the new 'objtool undwarf generate' command, which will rely on 'objtool check', move the checking code from builtin-check.c to check.c where it can be used by other commands. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/294c5c695fd73c1a5000bbe5960a7c9bec4ee6b4.1498659915.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>