tree-wide: check if errno is greater then zero

gcc is confused by the common idiom of
  return errno ? -errno : -ESOMETHING
and thinks a positive value may be returned. Replace this condition
with errno > 0 to help gcc and avoid many spurious warnings. I filed
a gcc rfe a long time ago, but it hard to say if it will ever be
implemented [1].

Both conventions were used in the codebase, this change makes things
more consistent. This is a follow up to bcb161b0230f.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61846

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/src/basic/glob-util.c b/src/basic/glob-util.c
index a0be0efd40..811ab6ec36 100644
--- a/src/basic/glob-util.c
+++ b/src/basic/glob-util.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int glob_exists(const char *path) {
         if (k == GLOB_NOSPACE)
                 return -ENOMEM;
         if (k != 0)
-                return errno ? -errno : -EIO;
+                return errno > 0 ? -errno : -EIO;
 
         return !strv_isempty(g.gl_pathv);
 }
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ int glob_extend(char ***strv, const char *path) {
         if (k == GLOB_NOSPACE)
                 return -ENOMEM;
         if (k != 0)
-                return errno ? -errno : -EIO;
+                return errno > 0 ? -errno : -EIO;
         if (strv_isempty(g.gl_pathv))
                 return -ENOENT;