1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
|
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1+ */
#include "sd-bus.h"
#include "main-func.h"
#include "tests.h"
static int test_ref_unref(void) {
sd_bus_message *m = NULL;
sd_bus *bus = NULL;
int r;
/* This test will result in a memory leak in <= v240, but not on v241. Hence to be really useful it
* should be run through a leak tracker such as valgrind. */
r = sd_bus_open_system(&bus);
if (r < 0)
return log_tests_skipped("Failed to connect to bus");
/* Create a message and enqueue it (this shouldn't send it though as the connection setup is not complete yet) */
assert_se(sd_bus_message_new_method_call(bus, &m, "foo.bar", "/foo", "quux.quux", "waldo") >= 0);
assert_se(sd_bus_send(bus, m, NULL) >= 0);
/* Let's now unref the message first and the bus second. */
m = sd_bus_message_unref(m);
bus = sd_bus_unref(bus);
/* We should have a memory leak now on <= v240. Let's do this again, but destroy in the opposite
* order. On v240 that too should be a leak. */
r = sd_bus_open_system(&bus);
if (r < 0)
return log_tests_skipped("Failed to connect to bus");
assert_se(sd_bus_message_new_method_call(bus, &m, "foo.bar", "/foo", "quux.quux", "waldo") >= 0);
assert_se(sd_bus_send(bus, m, NULL) >= 0);
/* Let's now unref things in the opposite order */
bus = sd_bus_unref(bus);
m = sd_bus_message_unref(m);
return 0;
}
static int run(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int r;
test_setup_logging(LOG_INFO);
r = test_ref_unref();
if (r < 0)
return r;
return 0;
}
DEFINE_MAIN_FUNCTION(run);
|
